23 april 2009: Bron: The New York Times

Avastin - Bevacizumab naast eerstelijns chemotherapie geeft geen enkel verschil in effect op voorkomen van recidief van darmkanker tegenover alleen chemotherapie met Irinitocan en Capecitabine (Xeloda). Dit meldt The New York Times. Een grote gerandomiseerde fase III studie bij meer dan 2200 darmkankerpatienten wereldwijd uitgevoerd toonde aan dat de ziektevrije tijd en overall overlevingen bij darmkankerpatienten die een geslaagde darmkankeroperatei hadden gehad niet anders was dan bij eerste lijns chemo. Deze studie is uit de media gehouden maar bij de overname van Roche is dit naar buiten gekomen. Hieronder een interessant artikel in The New York Times hoe Genentech manipuleerde met de gegevens om een zo hoog mogeijke prijs van Roche te krijgen voor de rechten op Avastin. Avastin lijkt echt een marketing medicijn te zijn.  En wordt ongelooflijk gepromoot voor een winst voor kankerpatienten van enkele maanden overleving. De winst in geld uitgedrukt voor Roche is daartegenover gigantisch. Maar dat weten we allemaal inmiddels wel lijkt mij. Hier achtereenvolgens het artikel uit The New York Times en daaronder een abstract van een studie die een vergeljking maakte van alleen chemo bij uitgezaaide darmkanker en chemo met Avastin - bevacizumab en tot dezelfde conclusie komt .

Avastin Falls Short in Test as Colon Cancer Medicine

 

 

 

By ANDREW POLLACK

 

Published: April 22, 2009

In results from a widely watched clinical trial, the drug Avastin failed to show a significant effect on preventing the recurrence of colon cancer, the drug’s maker, Genentech, said early Wednesday.

Although Avastin is already a best-selling cancer treatment, success in this trial could have paved the way to a new use of the drug, potentially increasing sales by billions of dollars a year.

Now those efforts will be set back. And it appears that the Swiss drug giant Roche may have paid more than necessary when it agreed in March to buy, for $46.8 billion, the portion of Genentech it did not already own.

Roche shares were down more than 10 percent on Wednesday, closing at $29.54.

Genentech and Roche said they would continue to try to develop Avastin for use in early-stage cancer.

“Our initial review of the data leads us to continue to believe Avastin may be active in patients with early-stage colon cancer,” Hal Barron, Genentech’s chief medical officer, said in a statement.

The companies did not release any data from the trial, saying the details would be presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting, which begins in late May. They said only that the trial did not meet its endpoint, meaning Avastin did not reduce the risk of cancer returning by the target level.

Avastin had sales of $2.7 billion in the United States alone last year. But it is currently approved only for late-stage colon, breast and lung cancers. In those uses, trials have shown the drug can prolong life up to a few months.

The new trial was an effort to use Avastin earlier in the course of the disease, right after surgery to remove the tumor. The hope of such so-called adjuvant therapy is to prevent the cancer from coming back at all, effectively curing the patient.

The trial had about 2,700 patients who received six months of the standard chemotherapy or six months of that chemotherapy plus a year of Avastin. The study, sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, measured how many patients were alive and free of cancer over time.

The existing chemotherapy already keeps about 70 percent of colon cancer patients free of the disease three years after their surgery. So a significant improvement over that level had been considered a high hurdle. Genentech had rated the chance of success in the trial at 61 percent, while Roche had forecast it at only 55 percent.

Roche has long insisted that its desire to own all of Genentech did not hinge on the results of this trial.

And yet, the trial appeared to play a prominent role in Roche’s months-long negotiations to buy the 44 percent of Genentech it did not already own. Roche, which had started those discussions last summer, wanted to get the deal done before the results of the Avastin trial were announced — on the assumption that a successful trial would have sent Genentech’s stock soaring, possibly putting the takeover price out of reach.

A failed trial, on the other hand, could have pushed down Genentech’s stock. So it now looks as if Roche could have paid less had the results come out before it completed the deal.

While fighting to remain independent or to persuade Roche to make a higher offer, Genentech, based in South San Francisco, Calif., argued that Avastin sales could quadruple, to $10 billion, by 2015 if the drug could be used for early-stage colon, lung and breast cancers. Roche, based in Basel, Switzerland, is running another trial of Avastin for early-stage colon cancer, with results expected in 2010.

 

1: World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jan 28;15(4):449-56.Click here to read Click here to read Links

 

Capecitabine and irinotecan with and without bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer patients.

1st Medical Department, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55116 Mainz, Germany. moehler@mail.uni-mainz.de

AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of cape-citabine plus irinotecan +/- bevacizumab in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS: Forty six patients with previously untreated, locally-advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were recruited between 2001-2006 in a prospective open-label phase II trial, in German community-based outpatient clinics. Patients received a standard capecitabine plus irinotecan (CAPIRI) or CAPIRI plus bevacizumab (CAPIRI-BEV) regimen every 3 wk. Dose reductions were mandatory from the first cycle in cases of > grade 2 toxicity. The treatment choice of bevacizumab was at the discretion of the physician. The primary endpoints were response and toxicity and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS: In the CAPIRI group vs the CAPRI-Bev group there were more female than male patients (47% vs 24%), and more patients had colon as the primary tumor site (58.8% vs 48.2%) with fewer patients having sigmoid colon as primary tumor site (5.9% vs 20.7%). Grade 3/4 toxicity was higher with CAPIRI than CAPIRI-Bev: 82% vs 58.6%. Partial response rates were 29.4% and 34.5%, and tumor control rates were 70.6% and 75.9%, respectively. No complete responses were observed. The median progression-free survival was 11.4 mo and 12.8 mo for CAPIRI and CAPIRI-Bev, respectively. The median overall survival for CAPIRI was 15 mo (458 d) and for CAPIRI-Bev 24 mo (733 d). These differences were not statistically different. In the CAPIRI-Bev, group, two patients underwent a full secondary tumor resection after treatment, whereas in the CAPIRI group no cases underwent this procedure.

CONCLUSION: Both regimens were well tolerated and offered effective tumor growth control in this outpatient setting. Severe gastrointestinal toxicities and thromboembolic events were rare and if observed were never fatal.

PMID: 19152449 [PubMed - in process]

PMCID: PMC2653366


Plaats een reactie ...

Reageer op "Darmkanker: Avastin - Bevacizumab naast chemo met Irinitocan en Capecitabine (Xeloda) faalt volledig bij voorkomen van recidief van darmkanker na geslaagde operatie , aldus grootschalige gerandomiseerde fase III studie."


Gerelateerde artikelen
 

Gerelateerde artikelen

Darmkanker: Avastin - Bevacizumab >> Avastin - bevacizumab naast >> Darmkanker: Avastin - bevacizumab >> Darmkanker: Avastin - Bevacizumab >> Darmkanker: Avastin - gevoelig >> Darmkanker: Avastin - Bevacizumab >> Darmkanker: Avastin en Oxaliplatin >> Darmkanker: Avastin samen >> Darmkanker: Avastin - bevacizumab >>