1 oktober 2010: Bron: Ann Surg.  2010; 251(5):796-803 (ISSN: 1528-1140)

Wanneer RFA wordt toegepast bij een vroege ontdekking van een recidief in de lever van eerdere geopereerde darmkanker dan lijkt RFA - Radio Frequency Ablation een evengoede of wellicht betere behandeling dan een operatieve ingreep. Al zijn er wel onzekerheden n.a.v. de studie die dit aantoont. De studie met 110 darmkankerpatienten (RFA 28 deelnemers, operatie 82 deelnemers) was niet gerandomiseerd. Bovendien was de diameter van de tumor bij RFA maximaal 3 cm. en bij een operatie 5 cm. Bovendien bleek na RFA de ziektevrije tijd beduidend minder dan bij een operatie 32% and 4% (P<0.001). Maar het belangrijkste was dat uiteindelijk mensen die RFA een of meerdere keren hadden gehad na weer een recidief een iets grotere kans hadden op uiteindelijke 3-jaars overleving. 67% was nog in leven in de RFA groep tegenover 60% in de operatiegroep (P=0.93). Hieronder het abstract van de studie met referentielijst van andere studies. Het volledige studieverslag is als u  hier klikt te lezenl

Radiofrequency ablation as first-line treatment in patients with early colorectal liver metastases amenable to surgery.

Ann Surg.  2010; 251(5):796-803 (ISSN: 1528-1140)

Otto G; Düber C; Hoppe-Lotichius M; König J; Heise M; Pitton MB
Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany. otto@transplantation.klinik.uni-mainz.de

OBJECTIVE: Aiming at avoidance of futile surgery, we have tested whether radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be used as first-line treatment in patients with colorectal metastases (CRLM) occurring within the first year after colorectal surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical resection is the standard treatment in patients with CRLM. Major retrospective analyses have identified the interval between colorectal surgery and the occurrence of CRLM to be of prognostic importance. So far, it is unknown whether survival of the respective patients is hampered if RFA is used as first-line treatment.

METHODS: According to a clinical pathway, we have treated patients with CRLM detected within the first year after colorectal surgery preferentially by RFA (n=28). Resection (n=82) was performed in patients who were deemed not amenable to RFA due to number, size, or location of metastatic lesions. The diameter of lesions differed between the groups. All other characteristics of patients and lesions were comparable. Local recurrence and new hepatic lesions were treated with repeated RFA or surgery whenever possible.

RESULTS: Local recurrence at the site of ablation or resection occurred in 32% and 4% (P<0.001), new metastases apart from the site of previous treatment in 50% and 34% (P=0.179), and systemic recurrence in 32% and 37% (P=0.820) of the patients after RFA and surgery, respectively. Time to progression was significantly shorter in patients primarily treated with RFA (203 vs. 416 days; P=0.017). After primary treatment, 9 RFA patients and 8 surgery patients were amenable to repeated RFA or repeated surgery resulting in identical rates of disease-free patients and identical 3-year overall survival in both treatment groups: 67% and 60%, respectively; P=0.93.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite striking differences in local tumor recurrence and shorter time to progression, survival in patients with early CRLM does not depend on the mode of primary hepatic treatment.

References

  1. Wagner JS, Adson MA, Van Heerden JA, et al. The natural history of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. A comparison with resective treatment. Ann Surg. 1984;199:502–508.
  2. Scheele J, Stangl R, Altendorf-Hofmann A. Hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma: impact of surgical resection on the natural history. Br J Surg. 1990;77:1241–1246.
  3. Wanebo HJ, Semoglou C, Attiyeh F, et al. Surgical management of patients with primary operable colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. Am J Surg. 1978;135:81–85.
  4. Wilson SM, Adson MA. Surgical treatment of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancers. Arch Surg. 1976;111:330–334.
  5. Chun YS, Vauthey JN. Extending the frontiers of resectability in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33(suppl 2):S52–S58.
  6. Nordlinger B, Peschaud F, Malafosse R. Resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer-how can we improve results? Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:515–517.
  7. Van Cutsem E, Nordlinger B, Adam R, et al. Towards a pan-European consensus on the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2212–2221.
  8. Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, et al. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244:254–259.
  9. Figueras J, Torras J, Valls C, et al. Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases in patients with expanded indications: a single-center experience with 501 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:478–488.
  10. Abdalla EK, Adam R, Bilchik AJ, et al. Improving resectability of hepatic colorectal metastases: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:1271–1280.
  11. Mulier S, Ni Y, Jamart J, et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases: time for a randomized trial? Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:144–157.
  12. Gillams AR, Lees WR. Radio-frequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases in 167 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:2261–2267.
  13. Leen E, Horgan PG. Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Surg Oncol. 2007;16:47–51.
  14. Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni F, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases in potential candidates for resection: the "test-of-time approach." Cancer. 2003;97:3027–3035.
  15. Sutherland LM, Williams JA, Padbury RT, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: a systematic review. Arch Surg. 2006;141:181–190.
  16. Siperstein AE, Berber E, Ballem N, et al. Survival after radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases: 10-year experience. Ann Surg. 2007;246:559–565, discussion 565–567.
  17. White RR, Avital I, Sofocleous CT, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrence for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and open wedge resection for solitary colorectal liver metastasis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:256–263.
  18. Park IJ, Kim HC, Yu CS, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for metachronous liver metastasis from colorectal cancer after curative surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:227–232.
  19. Berber E, Tsinberg M, Tellioglu G, et al. Resection versus laparoscopic radiofrequency thermal ablation of solitary colorectal liver metastasis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:1967–1972.
  20. Oshowo A, Gillams A, Harrison E, et al. Comparison of resection and radiofrequency ablation for treatment of solitary colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1240–1243.
  21. Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, et al. Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2004;239:818–825; discussion 825–827.
  22. Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Loyer EM, et al. Solitary colorectal liver metastasis: resection determines outcome. Arch Surg. 2006;141;460–466; discussion 466–467.
  23. Leblanc F, Fonck M, Brunet R, et al. Comparison of hepatic recurrences after resection or intraoperative radiofrequency ablation indicated by size and topographical characteristics of the metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:185–190.
  24. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, et al. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230:309–318; discussion 318–321.
  25. Nordlinger B, Guiguet M, Vaillant JC, et al. Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver. A prognostic scoring system to improve case selection, based on 1568 patients. Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Cancer. 1996;77:1254–1262.
  26. Jaeck D, Bachellier P, Guiguet M, et al. Long-term survival following resection of colorectal hepatic metastases. Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Br J Surg. 1997;84:977–980.
  27. Gomez D, Morris-Stiff G, Wyatt J, et al. Surgical technique and systemic inflammation influences long-term disease-free survival following hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:371–376.
  28. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Ardito F, et al. Influence of surgical margin on type of recurrence after liver resection for colorectal metastases: a single-center experience. Surgery. 2008;143:384–393.
  29. Mulier S, Ni Y, Jamart J, et al. Local recurrence after hepatic radiofrequency coagulation: multivariate meta-analysis and review of contributing factors. Ann Surg. 2005;242:158–171.
  30. Berber E, Siperstein A. Local recurrence after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: an analysis of 1032 tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2757–2764.
  31. Mulier S, Ruers T, Jamart J, et al. Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases: time for a randomized trial? An update. Dig Surg. 2008;25:445–460.
  32. Meredith K, Haemmerich D, Qi C, et al. Hepatic resection but not radiofrequency ablation results in tumor growth and increased growth factor expression. Ann Surg. 2007;245:771–776.

Plaats een reactie ...

Reageer op "Darmkanker: RFA - Radio Frequency Ablation bij recidief in lever bij darmkanker geeft betere overleving dan operatie ondanks kortere ziektevrije tijd"


Gerelateerde artikelen
 

Gerelateerde artikelen

Darmkanker: RFA naast systemische >> RFA - Radio frequency Ablation >> Darmkanker: RFA - Radio Frequency >> Darmkanker: RFA wordt in overzichtstudie >> Darmkanker: RFA - Radio Frequency >> Darmkanker: RFA - Radio Frequency >> Darmkanker: RFA - Radio Frequency >>