21 juni 2025: Bron: ASCO 2025 en de Amplitude studie

Uit de placebo gecontroleerde fase 3 studie Amplitude bij totaal 696 patiënten gelijk verdeeld over twee groepen met  castratieresistente gevorderde prostaatkanker geeft de parpremmer niraparib wanneer toegevoegd aan een standaardbehandeling beduidend langere ziektevrije tijd en overall overleving in vergelijking met een placebo en standaardbehandeling. 

Na een mediane follow-up van iets meer dan 2,5 jaar (30,8 maanden) zagen de onderzoekers het volgende:

  • Niraparib verbeterde de radiologische progressievrije overleving (rPFS) significant in vergelijking met placebo.
  • Bij de patiënten die niraparib kregen, werd de mediane rPFS niet gehaald, terwijl de patiënten die placebo kregen een mediane rPFS van 29,5 maanden hadden.
  • Over het geheel genomen verlaagde niraparib het risico op kankergroei met 37% in vergelijking met alleen AAP bij alle patiënten en met 48% in de subgroep van patiënten met BRCA1- of BRCA2-mutaties.
  • De tijd tot verergering van de symptomen was langer voor patiënten die niraparib kregen in vergelijking met patiënten die een placebo kregen.
  • Onderzoekers zagen een trend naar een verbeterde algehele overleving in de niraparibgroep. Deze gegevens waren echter nog onvolledig, omdat ze nog niet voldeden aan de criteria voor statistische significantie.
Wel werden er in de niraparibgroep meer bijwerkingen gezien dan in de placebogroep: 

Ernstige bijwerkingen kwamen vaker voor in de niraparibgroep. In deze groep ondervond 75,2% van de patiënten ernstige of levensbedreigende bijwerkingen, vergeleken met 58,9% van de patiënten in de placebogroep. De meest voorkomende ernstige bijwerkingen waren bloedarmoede en hypertensie. Ook stopten meer patiënten in de niraparibgroep met de behandeling vanwege bijwerkingen (15% versus 10% in de placebogroep).

Op ASCO 2025 werd een uitgebreide beschrijving van de studie gepresenteerd. Klik daarvoor op de titel:

ASCO Perspective Quote

“This trial emphasizes the importance of germline and somatic testing in patients with metastatic prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis; homologous recombination repair mutations have been identified in up to 25% of patients with metastatic disease and this study shows that early intervention with a PARP inhibitor may improve outcomes. While the combinations of novel hormone therapies and PARP inhibitors have already shown to improve outcomes in the castrate-resistant setting, this is the first trial to show that the addition of a PARP inhibitor to abiraterone may have a role in the hormone-sensitive setting in those with homologous recombination repair deficient prostate cancer,” said Bradley McGregor, MD, Director of Clinical Research for the Lank Center of Genitourinary Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and an ASCO Expert in genitourinary cancers.

Study at-a-Glance 

Focus Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) with alterations in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. 
Population 696 patients with a median age of 68 years old. More than half the patients (55.6%) had alterations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, and most had tumors with aggressive features.
Main Takeaway Adding niraparib to standard treatment can help slow cancer growth for people with mCSPC with HRR gene alterations.
Significance
  • Although a combination of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors has improved survival in patients with mCSPC, certain genomic alterations, such as those in the HRR pathway, lead to a poor prognosis. Therefore, there is still a need for treatments for tumors with HRR alterations.
  • Niraparib is a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that is approved for HRR-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This approval was based on the MAGNITUDE study, which showed improvements in radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) in people who had not benefited from other treatment options.
  • This treatment is not yet approved for mCSPC. The AMPLITUDE study was designed to evaluate niraparib in these patients.


CHICAGO
 — Results from the international phase 3 AMPLITUDE clinical trial found that adding niraparib to abiraterone acetate (AKEEGA™) plus prednisone (AAP) can help slow cancer growth for people with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations. These results build on findings from the previous MAGNITUDE study, which led to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of niraparib with AAP for HRR-altered mCRPC. The research will be presented at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, taking place May 30-June 3 in Chicago.  

About the Study

“Metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease with diverse responses to therapies. Although a combination of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors has improved survival in patients with this diagnosis, certain genomic alterations, such as those in the HRR pathway, confer poor prognosis. Therefore, there is still a need for treatments that are tailored to patients whose tumors harbor HRR alterations,” said lead study author Gerhardt Attard, MD, PhD, FRCP, Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Approximately 1 in 4 people with mCSPC have alterations in the HRR genes. Examples of HRR genes include BRCA1BRCA2CHEK2, and PALB2. Research has shown that people with mCSPC with HRR gene alterations have reduced survival chances, and most patients with mCSPC will eventually develop mCRPC. By definition, mCSPC is earlier-stage disease where the cancer is still sensitive to hormone therapy, while mCRPC is more advanced as the cancer becomes resistant to these therapies. People with mCRPC often have a poor prognosis and a poor response to treatment.  

Previous results from the MAGNITUDE clinical trial showed that treatment with the PARP inhibitor niraparib combined with AAP helped slow cancer growth in people with mCRPC with HRR gene alterations. These findings led the FDA to approve niraparib with AAP for these patients in 2023. In the AMPLITUDE clinical trial, researchers wanted to learn if the same benefits of niraparib could be seen in people with mCSPC. 

The study enrolled 696 patients with mCSPC with either germline or somatic HRR gene alterations. The median age of patients in the study was 68 years old. The patients had received no more than 6 months of treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Eligible patients could have also received 6 or fewer cycles of docetaxel and/or treatment with AAP for 45 days or fewer if their metastatic cancer had spread outside the lymph nodes.  

The patients were randomly assigned to receive either niraparib with AAP (348 patients) or AAP with a placebo (348 patients). Of the patients, more than half (55.6%) had alterations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Most of the patients also had tumors with aggressive features, such as cancer that had spread to the lymph nodes or was already at an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. 

Key Findings 

At a median follow-up of just over 2.5 years (30.8 months), the researchers found that:

  • Niraparib significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) compared to the placebo. In the patients who received niraparib, the median rPFS was not met, while the patients who received a placebo had a median rPFS of 29.5 months.  
  • Overall, niraparib reduced the risk of cancer growth by 37% compared to AAP alone in all patients and by 48% in the subgroup of patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
  • The time until symptoms got worse was longer for patients who received niraparib compared to those who received a placebo.  
  • Researchers observed a trend toward improved overall survival in the niraparib group. However, these data were still immature, as they did not yet meet the criteria for statistical significance. 

Serious side effects were more common in the niraparib group. In this group, 75.2% of patients experienced serious or life-threatening side effects compared to 58.9% of those in the placebo group. The most common serious side effects were anemia and hypertension. More patients in the niraparib group also discontinued treatment due to side effects (15% vs. 10% in the placebo group). 

Next Steps

Future research will focus on exploring niraparib with AAP earlier in disease evolution. Researchers will also continue to study niraparib with AAP given in combination with other drugs that have complementary mechanisms of action for prostate cancer at different stages. 

This study was funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC.

View author disclosures  

View the abstract

View the News Planning Team disclosures

Het abstract is dit:

Phase 3 AMPLITUDE trial: Niraparib (NIRA) and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients (pts) with alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes.  

Authors

person
Gerhardt Attard

Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom

Gerhardt Attard, Neeraj Agarwal, Julie Graff, Shahneen Sandhu, Eleni Efstathiou, Mustafa Özgüroğlu, Andrea Pereira de Santana Gomes, Karina Vianna, Hong Luo, Heather Cheng, Won Kim, Carly Varela, Daneen Schaeffer, Shiva Dibaj, Susan Li, Fei Shen, Suneel Dinkar Mundle, David Olmos, Kim Chi, Dana Rathkopf

Organizations

Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Oregon Health & Science University and Knight Cancer Institute and Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, Liga Norte Riograndense Contra o Câncer, Natal, Brazil, Centro Integrado de Oncologia de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China, University of Washington & Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, Johnson & Johnson, Los Angeles, CA, Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA, Johnson & Johnson, San Diego, CA, Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, NJ, I+12 Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, BC Cancer – Vancouver Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Abstract Disclosures

Research Funding

Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company

Background:

NIRA is a highly selective and potent inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1/2. In the MAGNITUDE trial, NIRA + AAP significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in HRR gene–altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled AMPLITUDE trial (NCT04497844) evaluated the efficacy and safety of NIRA + AAP in HRR gene–altered mCSPC.

Methods:

Pts with germline or somatic HRR gene alterations (BRCA1BRCA2BRIP1CDK12CHEK2FANCAPALB2, RAD51B, RAD54L) were randomized 1:1 to a dual-action tablet (NIRA 200 mg + abiraterone acetate 1000 mg) plus prednisone 5 mg, or PBO + AAP (hereafter AAP). Eligible pts had received ≤6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) ± ≤6 cycles of docetaxel (DOC) ± ≤45 d of AAP with metastatic disease extended beyond lymph nodes. The primary end point is investigator-assessed rPFS (time from randomization to radiographic progression or death). Secondary end points include time to symptomatic progression (TSP), overall survival (OS), and safety. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method and a stratified Cox model were used for time-to-event variables and the hazard ratio (HR) and stratified log-rank test for estimating treatment effect. This is the first and final analysis for rPFS and the first interim analysis (of 3) for OS (data cutoff, 7 Jan 2025). Approximately 261 rPFS events were required (2-sided α, 0.025; power, 91%) for an HR ≤0.64 to demonstrate efficacy.

Results:

696 pts were randomized to NIRA + AAP (n=348) or AAP (n=348). Median age was 68 y (IQR, 61-74); 55.6% had BRCA1/2 alterations, 78% were high-volume metastatic (M1), 87% were de novo M1, and 16% had prior DOC. Median follow-up is 30.8 mo. The primary end point was met, with rPFS significantly longer with NIRA + AAP (median, not reached ) vs AAP (29.5 mo [95% CI, 25.8-NR]; HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.80], p=0.0001), including in the prespecified BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37-0.72], p<0.0001). TSP was significantly improved with NIRA + AAP vs AAP (HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.36-0.69], p<0.0001; BRCA1/2: HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.29-0.68], p=0.0001). A trend in OS was seen at this first interim analysis (193/389 events) favoring NIRA + AAP (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.59-1.04], p=0.10; BRCA1/2: HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.51-1.11], p=0.15). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 75.2% with NIRA + AAP and 58.9% with AAP, most commonly anemia (29.1% vs 4.6%) and hypertension (26.5% vs 18.4%). Treatment discontinuations due to AEs were low: NIRA + AAP: 11.0%; AAP: 6.9%.

Conclusions:

NIRA + AAP significantly improved rPFS and TSP vs AAP in pts receiving ADT +/- prior DOC and had a favorable effect on OS. There were no new safety signals. AMPLITUDE supports NIRA + AAP as a potential new standard of care for pts with HRR gene–altered mCSPC.
This material on this page is ©2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org


Plaats een reactie ...

Reageer op "Niraparib toegevoegd aan standaard behandelingen geeft betere resultaten op ziektevrije tijd en overall overleving bij patienten met castratieresistente gevorderde prostaatkanker"


Gerelateerde artikelen
 

Gerelateerde artikelen

Niraparib toegevoegd aan standaard >> Cabozantinib in combinatie >> Olaparib geeft betere resultaten >> Rupacarib (Rubraca) geeft >> Talazoparib toegevoegd aan >> Talazoparib, een PARP remmer, >> Parpremmers bij prostaatkanker, >>