15 februari 2024: Andere artikelen met positieve effecten van koffie bij andere vormen van kanker zie deze search op onze website

15 februari 2024: Bron: Universiteit van Wageningen en International Journal of Cancer

Uit de Nederlandse COLON studie, een longitudinaal, observationeel onderzoek naar voedings- en levensstijlfactoren die een recidief van darmkankertumoren en de overleving en de kwaliteit van leven kunnen beïnvloeden, blijkt dat dagelijks een aantal koppen koffie drinken de kans op een recidief met 32 procent vermindert na een geslaagde behandeling bij patiënten met darmkanker stadium I tot III in vergelijking met dagelijks maximaal 2 koppen koffie of minder.
Daaruit voortvloeiend blijkt ook de kans op overlijden aan de ziekte voor die patiënten die dagelijks koffie dronken ook beduidend minder in vergelijking met weinig of geen koffie drinkers. Gecorrigeerd naar aantal factoren waaronder rokers en niet rokers en ook thee drinkers. 

Uit de nieuwe onderzoeksgegevens blijkt dat deelnemers die meer dan vier kopjes koffie per dag dronken – in vergelijking met deelnemers die minder dan twee kopjes koffie per dag dronken – 32 procent minder kans hadden op terugkeer van darmkanker na behandeling. Daarnaast hadden ze minder kans op sterfte bij darmkanker, waarbij blijkt dat drie tot vijf kopjes per dag het beste zou zijn om die kans te verkleinen.

De Nederlandse COLON studie staat onder leiding van Ellen Kampman, hoogleraar Voeding en Ziekte bij Wageningen University & Research. 

Inmiddels hebben 1719 darmkankerpatiënten mee gedaan of doen nog mee aan deze studie:

Description unavailable



Deelnemers die >4 kopjes/dag consumeerden vergeleken met degenen die <2 kopjes/dag consumeerden, waren meer mannen (69% vs. 54%), huidige rokers (15% vs. 6%) met meer pakjaren (10,1 pakjaren vs. 3,2 pakjaren), waren lichamelijk actiever (720,0 min/wk vs. 615,0 min/wk), en hadden een hogere inname van energie (1978,7 Kcal/d vs. 1670,8 Kcal/d) en alcohol (9,5 vs. 3,7 g/d).
Daar tegenover stond dat deelnemers die >4 kopjes/dag consumeerden vergeleken met degenen die <2 kopjes/dag consumeerden, hadden minder kans om SSB te consumeren (62,0 versus 72,1 g/dag) en hadden minder kans op een initiële tumor in het proximale darm (25 % versus 38%) (Zie karakteristieken van de deelnemers in Table 1). Er werden geen verschillen waargenomen voor BMI, opleiding en theeconsumptie tussen de categorieën koffieconsumptie.

ConclusieDeze grote prospectieve studie onder stadium I-III darmkankerpatiënten in een land met een relatief hoge koffie-inname bracht een sterk omgekeerd verband aan het licht tussen koffieconsumptie en het terugkeren van darmkanker. Het verband tussen koffieconsumptie en sterfte door alle oorzaken bij patiënten met darmkanker was niet-lineair, wat duidt op een optimale inname van drie tot vijf kopjes per dag.


Details are in the caption following the image

De nieuwste onderzoeksgegevens zijn gepubliceerd in International Journal of Cancer en is als volledig rapport in te zien of te downloaden. Klik op de titel van het abstract:

Abstract

Coffee consumption has been associated with a reduced risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it is not clear whether coffee consumption is related to CRC progression. Hence, we assessed the association of coffee consumption with CRC recurrence and all-cause mortality using data from a prospective cohort study of 1719 stage I–III CRC patients in the Netherlands. Coffee consumption and other lifestyle characteristics were self-reported using questionnaires at the time of diagnosis. We retrieved recurrence and all-cause mortality data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Personal Records Database, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression models with and without restricted cubic splines were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for age, sex, education, smoking status, cancer stage and tumor location. We observed 257 recurrences during a 6.2-year median follow-up and 309 deaths during a 6.6-year median follow-up. Consuming more than 4 cups/d of coffee compared to an intake of <2 cups/d was associated with a 32% lower risk of CRC recurrence (95% CI: 0.49, 0.94,). The association between coffee consumption and all-cause mortality was U-shaped; coffee intake seemed optimal at 3–5 cups/d with the lowest risk at 4 cups/d (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.88).
Our results suggest that coffee consumption may be associated with a lower risk of CRC recurrence and all-cause mortality. The association between coffee consumption and all-cause mortality appeared nonlinear. More studies are needed to understand the mechanism by which coffee consumption might improve CRC prognosis.

What's new?

Although existing evidence suggests that coffee consumption may lower colorectal cancer risk, the association with colorectal cancer prognosis remains unclear. This large prospective study of stage I–III patients in a country with a relatively high coffee intake revealed a strong inverse association between coffee consumption and colorectal cancer recurrence. The association between coffee consumption and all-cause mortality in colorectal cancer patients was nonlinear, suggesting an optimal intake of three to five cups per day. The findings could potentially inform future intervention studies as well as dietary guidelines for colorectal cancer patients.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization, Abisola M. Oyelere, Dieuwertje E. Kok, Fränzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Ellen Kampman; methodology, Abisola M. Oyelere, Dieuwertje E. Kok, Fränzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Ellen Kampman; validation, Abisola M. Oyelere, Dieuwertje E. Kok, Fränzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Ellen Kampman; formal analysis, Abisola M. Oyelere; investigation Abisola M. Oyelere; resources, Johannes H. W.de Wilt, Henk K. van Halteren, Ewout A. Kouwenhoven; data curation, Abisola M. Oyelere; writing-original draft preparation, Abisola M. Oyelere; writing-review and editing, all authors; visualization, Abisola M. Oyelere; supervision; Dieuwertje E. Kok, Fränzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Ellen Kampman; project administration, Abisola M. Oyelere; funding acquisition, Dieuwertje E. Kok, Daniel Bos, Marc J. Gunter, Pietro Ferrari, Pekka Keski Rahkonen, Fränzel J. B. van Duijnhoven, Ellen Kampman. The work reported in this article has been performed by the authors, unless clearly specified in the text. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank all participants in the COLON study, COLON investigators at Wageningen University & Research, and co-workers from the following hospitals for their effort in recruiting participants into the study: Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede; RadboudUMC, Nijmegen; Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem; Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen; Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem; Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn/Zutphen; Hospital Bernhoven, Uden; Isala, Zwolle; ZGT, Almelo; Martini Hospital, Groningen; Admiraal de Ruyter Hospital, Goes/Vlissingen, all in the Netherlands. The authors thank the registration team of the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL) for the collection of data for the Netherlands Cancer Registry.

    FUNDING INFORMATION

    The COLON study was financially supported by Wereld Kanker Onderzoek Fonds (WKOF) & World Cancer Research Fund International (WCRF International) as well as by funding (2014/1179, IIG_FULL_2021_022 and IIG_FULL_2021_023) obtained from the Wereld Kanker Onderzoek Fonds (WKOF) as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International grant program; Alpe d'HuZes/Dutch Cancer Society (UM 2012–5653, UW 2013–5927, UW 2015–7946); ERA-NET on Translational Cancer Research (TRANSCAN: Dutch Cancer Society (UW2013-6397, UW2014-6877), the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw), the Netherlands) and the Regio Deal Foodvalley (162135). The sponsors were not involved in the design, analysis, and interpretation of data in this study.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

    All authors declare no conflict of interest.

    ETHICS STATEMENT

    The COLON study (NCT0319110; ClinicalTrials.gov) was approved by an institutional review board (region Arnhem-Nijmegen, 2009–349) and all participants provided written informed consents.

    DISCLAIMER

    Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policies, or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization.

    REFERENCES
    • 1Micek AGniadek AKawalec PBrzostek TCoffee consumption and colorectal cancer risk: a dose-response meta-analysis on prospective cohort studiesInt J Food Sci Nutr201970986-1006.
    • 2Gan YWu JZhang S, et al. Association of coffee consumption with risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studiesOncotarget2017818699-18711.
    • 3Guercio BJSato KNiedzwiecki D, et al. Coffee intake, recurrence, and mortality in stage III colon cancer: Results from CALGB 89803 (Alliance)J Clin Oncol2015333598-3607.
    • 4Hu YDing MYuan C, et al. Association between coffee intake after diagnosis of colorectal cancer and reduced mortalityGastroenterology2018154916-926.e9.
    • 5Sun HLiu YHuang HLi DZhao YDiet quality score and survival rate in patients with colorectal cancerAsia Pac J Clin Nutr201928601-606.
    • 6Mackintosh CYuan COu FS, et al. Association of Coffee Intake with survival in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancerJAMA Oncol202061713-1721.
    • 7Grosso GGodos JGalvano FGiovannucci ELCoffee, caffeine, and health outcomes: an umbrella reviewAnnu Rev Nutr201737131-156.
    • 8Poole RKennedy OJRoderick PFallowfield JAHayes PCParkes JCoffee consumption and health: umbrella review of meta-analyses of multiple health outcomesBMJ2017359:j5024.
    • 9Horisaki KTakahashi KIto HMatsui SA dose-response meta-analysis of coffee consumption and colorectal cancer risk in the Japanese population: application of a cubic-spline modelJ Epidemiol201828503-509.
    • 10Gapstur SMAnderson RLCampbell PT, et al. Associations of coffee drinking and cancer mortality in the cancer prevention study-IICancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2017261477-1486.
    • 11Kuo YHHung HYYou JFChiang JMChin CCCommon habitual behaviors and synchronous colorectal cancer risk: a retrospective case-control studyInt J Colorectal Dis2019341421-1430.
    • 12Kerimi AKraut NUda Encarnacao JAWilliamson GThe gut microbiome drives inter- and intra-individual differences in metabolism of bioactive small moleculesSci Rep202010(1):19590. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76558-5
    • 13Cornelis MCEl-Sohemy AKabagambe EKCampos HCoffee, CYP1A2 genotype, and risk of myocardial infarctionJAMA20062951135-1141.
    • 14Arici MÖzhan GThe genetic profiles of CYP1A1, CYP1A2 and CYP2E1 enzymes as susceptibility factor in xenobiotic toxicity in Turkish populationSaudi Pharm J201725294-297.
    • 15van Dam RMHu FBCoffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes a systematic reviewJAMA200529497-104.
    • 16Gaascht FDicato MDiederich MCoffee provides a natural multitarget pharmacopeia against the hallmarks of cancerGenes Nutr2015101-17.
    • 17Romualdo GRRocha ABVinken M, et al. Drinking for protection? Epidemiological and experimental evidence on the beneficial effects of coffee or major coffee compounds against gastrointestinal and liver carcinogenesisFood Res Int2019123567-589.
    • 18Ludwig IAClifford MNLean MEJAshihara HCrozier ACoffee: biochemistry and potential impact on healthFood Funct201451695-1717.
    • 19Moreno-Ceballos MArroyave JCCortes-Mancera FMRöthlisberger SChemopreventive effect of coffee against colorectal cancer and hepatocellular carcinomaInt J Food Prop201922536-555.
    • 20González SSalazar NRuiz-saavedra Sde los Reyes-Gavilán CGGueimonde MLong-term coffee consumption is associated with fecal microbial composition in humansNutrients202012(5): 1287.
    • 21Brouwer NPMBos ACRKLemmens VEPP, et al. An overview of 25 years of incidence, treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer patientsInt J Cancer2018143(11): 2758-2766. doi:10.1002/ijc.31785
    • 22 Netherlands Cancer RegistryNational data. Published 20212023 https://iknl.nl/nkr-cijfers
    • 23Qaderi SMGaljart BVerhoef CSlooter GDKoopman MVerhoeven RHAde Wilt JHW & van Erning FNDisease recurrence after colorectal cancer surgery in the modern era: a population-based studyInt J Colorectal Dis 20213623992410.
    • 24van der Stok EPSpaander MCWGrünhagen DJVerhoef CKuipers EJSurveillance after curative treatment for colorectal cancerNat Rev Clin Oncol201714297-315.
    • 25Gunter MJMurphy NCross AJ, et al. Coffee drinking and mortality in 10 European countries: a multinational cohort studyAnn Intern Med2017167(4): 236-247. doi:10.7326/M16-2945
    • 26Winkels RMHeine-Bröring RCvan Zutphen M, et al. The COLON study: colorectal cancer: longitudinal, observational study on nutritional and lifestyle factors that may influence colorectal tumour recurrence, survival and quality of lifeBMC Cancer2014141-8.
    • 27Feunekes GIJVan Staveren WADe Vries JHMBurema JHautvast JGAJRelative and biomarker-based validity of a food-frequency questionnaire estimating intake of fats and cholesterolAm J Clin Nutr199358489-496.
    • 28Feunekes IJvan Staveren WAGraveland Fde Vos JBurema JReproducibility of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess the intake of fats and cholesterol in The NetherlandsInt J Food Sci Nutr199546117-123.
    • 29Verkleij-Hagoort ACde Vries JHMStegers MPGLindemans JUrsem NTCSteegers-Theunissen RPMValidation of the assessment of folate and vitamin B12 intake in women of reproductive age: the method of triadsEur J Clin Nutr200761610-615.
    • 30Reyes CMCornelis MCCaffeine in the diet: country-level consumption and guidelinesNutrients2018101772.
    • 31de Hollander ELZwart Lde Vries SIWendel-Vos WThe SQUASH was a more valid tool than the OBiN for categorizing adults according to the Dutch physical activity and the combined guidelineJ Clin Epidemiol201265(1): 73-81. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.05.005
    • 32Ainsworth BEHaskell WLHerrmann SD, et al. 2011 compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET valuesMed Sci Sports Exerc2011431575-1581.
    • 33van Leersum NJSnijders HSHenneman D, et al. The dutch surgical colorectal auditEur J Surg Oncol2013391063-1070.
    • 34Bennette CVickers AAgainst quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontentsBMC Med Res Methodol20121221.
    • 35Williamson EJAitken ZLawrie JDharmage SCBurgess JAForbes ABIntroduction to causal diagrams for confounder selectionRespirology201419303-311.
    • 36Textor Jvan der Zander BGilthorpe MSLiśkiewicz MEllison GTRobust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: The R package dagittyInt J Epidemiol2016451887-1894.
    • 37Harrell FRegression Modeling Strategies. Springer; 2001.
    • 38Desquilbet LMariotti FDose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health researchStat Med2010291037-1057.
    • 39Safe SKothari JHailemariam AUpadhyay SDavidson LAChapkin RSHealth benefits of coffee consumption for cancer and other diseases and mechanisms of actionInt J Mol Sci202324(3): 2706. doi:10.3390/ijms24032706
    • 40Kojima MWakai KTokudome S, et al. Bowel movement frequency and risk of colorectal cancer in a large cohort study of Japanese men and womenBr J Cancer2004901397-1401.
    • 41Jaquet MRochat IMoulin JCavin CBibiloni RImpact of coffee consumption on the gut microbiota: a human volunteer studyInt J Food Microbiol2009130117-121.
    • 42Faghfoori ZFaghfoori MHSaber AIzadi AAnticancer effects of bifidobacteria on colon cancer cell linesCancer Cell Int202121258.
    • 43Ruhl CEEverhart JECoffee and caffeine consumption reduce the risk of elevated serum alanine aminotransferase activity in the United StatesGastroenterology200512824-32.
    • 44Wijarnpreecha KThongprayoon CUngprasert PCoffee consumption and risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysisEur J Gastroenterol Hepatol201729e8-e12.
    • 45Lv YPatel NZhang HJThe progress of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as the risk of liver metastasis in colorectal cancerExpert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol2019131169-1180.
    • 46Crippa ADiscacciati ALarsson SCWolk AOrsini NCoffee consumption and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: a dose-response meta-analysisAm J Epidemiol2014180763-775.
    • 47Chen JZheng YWang H, et al. Cause of death among patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study in the United StatesAging20201222927-22948.
    • 48Chrysant SGCoffee consumption and cardiovascular healthAm J Cardiol2015116818-821.
    • 49Fadel PJNitric oxide and cardiovascular regulation: beyond the endotheliumHypertension201769778-779.
    • 50Safari MMahjub HEsmaeili HAbbasi MRoshanaei GSpecific causes of recurrence after surgery and mortality in patients with colorectal cancer: a competing risks survival analysisJ Res Med Sci20212613.











    Plaats een reactie ...

    Reageer op "Koffie vermindert kans op recidief en vermindert kans op overlijden bij patienten met darmkanker stadium I tot III blijkt uit Nederlandse COLON studie"


    Gerelateerde artikelen
     

    Gerelateerde artikelen

    Koffie vermindert kans op >> Handjevol noten elke dag verbetert >> Voeding vermindert kans op >> Foliumzuur en darmkanker: >> Folinic Acid vorm van foliumzuur >> Bloemkool, wortelen, uien >> Citrusvruchten goed voor darmen >> Voeding: Wanneer darmkankerpatienten >> Voeding bij darmkanker, een >>