9 januari 2023: zie ook literatuurlijst van voeding en weinig belastende middelen en behandelingen specifiek bij primaire leverkanker opgesteld door arts-bioloog drs. Engelbert Valstar.

9 januari 2023: zie ook artikelen over TACE bij levertumoren 

9 januari 2023: Bron: Journal of Clinical Oncology Published online December 16, 2022

In een gerandomiseerde open-label studie uitgevoerd in verschillende ziekenhuizen kregen patiënten met primaire leverkanker met histologisch bevestigde microvasculaire invasie na een volledige operatie aanvullend HAIC = Hepatische Arteriële Infusie Chemotherapie met FOLFOX of ondergingen routinematige een standaard follow-up behandeling.
Het primaire eindpunt van ziektevrije overleving was significant verbeterd met 20,3 maanden in de HAIC-groep versus 10,0 maanden in de controlegroep. De recidiefpercentages waren ook beduidend lager in de behandelingsgroep. 40.1% (63 uit 157 patiënten) in de behandelingsgroep en 55.7% (88 uit 158 patiënten) in de controlegroep.

Uit het studierapport vertaald:

Belangrijkste doelstelling:

Voor zover wij weten, is er geen standaardbehandeling voorgesteld als aanvullende therapie voor patiënten met primaire leverkanker (HCC) met microvasculaire invasie, en onze studie is de eerste fase III-studie om de waarde van HAIC = Hepatische Arteriële Infusie Chemotherapie van oxaliplatine, fluorouracil en leucovorine te evalueren als adjuvante therapie in deze populatie.

Kennis gegenereerd:

Hepatische arteriële infusiechemotherapie (HAIC) met 5-fluorouracil en oxaliplatine verbeterde significant de ziektevrije overleving (20,3 versus 10,0 maanden, P = 0,001) in vergelijking met routinematige follow-up bij HCC-patiënten met microvasculaire invasie. Er was geen significant verschil in de incidentie van operatie gerelateerde bijwerkingen tussen de twee groepen (p = 0,597).

Relevantie (EM O'Reilly)
Deze gegevens zijn intrigerend en bieden voortdurende ondersteuning voor het voortdurende onderzoek naar infusietherapie van de leverarterie bij patiënten met HCC.*
*Relevantiesectie geschreven door JCO Associate Editor Eileen M. O'Reilly, MD.

Het volledige studierapport is gratis in te zien. Klik op de titel van het abstract:

To report the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI).

In this randomized, open-label, multicenter trial, histologically confirmed HCC patients with MVI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive adjuvant FOLFOX-HAIC (treatment group) or routine follow-up (control group). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis while secondary end points were overall survival, recurrence rate, and safety.

Between June 2016 and August 2021, a total of 315 patients (ITT population) at five centers were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 157) or the control group (n = 158). In the ITT population, the median DFS was 20.3 months (95% CI, 10.4 to 30.3) in the treatment group versus 10.0 months (95% CI, 6.8 to 13.2) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.81; P = .001). The overall survival rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 93.8% (95% CI, 89.8 to 98.1), 86.4% (95% CI, 80.0 to 93.2), and 80.4% (95% CI, 71.9 to 89.9) for the treatment group and 92.0% (95% CI, 87.6 to 96.7), 86.0% (95% CI, 79.9 to 92.6), and 74.9% (95% CI, 65.5 to 85.7) for the control group (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.14; P = .130), respectively. The recurrence rates were 40.1% (63/157) in the treatment group and 55.7% (88/158) in the control group. Majority of the adverse events were grade 0-1 (83.8%), with no treatment-related death in both groups.

Postoperative adjuvant HAIC with FOLFOX significantly improved the DFS benefits with acceptable toxicities in HCC patients with MVI.

PRIOR PRESENTATION

Presented in part at the Gastrointestinal Cancer session of the 2022 ASCO annual meeting, Chicago, IL, June 5, 2022.

SUPPORT

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871985), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2018A0303130098 and No. 2017A030310203), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (No. 2017A020215112), Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. A2017477), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou (No. 201903010017 and No. 201904010479), Clinical Trials Project (5010 Project) of Sun Yat-sen University (No. 5010-2017009), and Clinical Trials Project (308 Project) of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (No. 308-2015-014).

CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION

NCT03192618

Conception and design: Shao-Hua Li, Ji-Bin Li, Lie Zheng, Huan-Wei Chen, Chong Zhong, Wei Wei

Financial support: Shao-Hua Li, Huan-Wei Chen, Wei Wei

Administrative support: Jing-Wen Zou, Yu-Hua Wen, Lie Zheng, Huan-Wei Chen, Wei Wei

Provision of study materials or patients: Yuan Cheng, Qiao-Xuan Wang, Chong-Kai Fang, Qiu-Cheng Lei, Ming-Rong Cao, Jing-Duo Deng, Yu-Chuan Jiang, Rong-Ce Zhao, Huan-Wei Chen, Wei Wei

Collection and assembly of data: Shao-Hua Li, Jie Mei, Yuan Cheng, Qiang Li, Qiao-Xuan Wang, Chong-Kai Fang, Qiu-Cheng Lei, Hua-Kun Huang, Ming-Rong Cao, Rui Luo, Jing-Duo Deng, Yu-Chuan Jiang, Rong-Ce Zhao, Jing-Wen Zou, Min Deng, Ren-Guo Guan, Yu-Hua Wen, Zhi-Xing Guo, Yi-Hong Ling, Huan-Wei Chen, Chong Zhong, Wei Wei

Data analysis and interpretation: Shao-Hua Li, Jie Mei, Ming-Rong Cao, Yu-Chuan Jiang, Rong-Ce Zhao, Liang-He Lu, Wen-Ping Lin, Ji-Bin Li, Huan-Wei Chen, Chong Zhong, Wei Wei, Rong-Ping Guo

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

Accountable for all aspects of the work: All authors

Postoperative Adjuvant Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy With FOLFOX in Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Microvascular Invasion: A Multicenter, Phase III, Randomized Study

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/jco/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

No potential conflicts of interest were reported.

1. Hsu SJXu XChen MP, et al: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with modified FOLFOX as an alternative treatment option in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients with failed or unsuitability for transarterial chemoembolization. Acad Radiol 28:S157-S1662021 (Suppl 1CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
2. Saito AToyoda HKobayashi M, et al: Prediction of early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection using digital pathology images assessed by machine learning. Mod Pathol 34:417-4252021 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
3. Govalan RLauzon MLuu M, et al: Comparison of surgical resection and systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion: National cancer database analysis. Liver Cancer 10:407-4182021 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
4. Roayaie SBlume INThung SN, et al: A system of classifying microvascular invasion to predict outcome after resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 137:850-8552009 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
5. Rodríguez-Perálvarez MLuong TVAndreana L, et al: A systematic review of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: Diagnostic and prognostic variability. Ann Surg Oncol 20:325-3392013 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
6. Lim KCChow PKAllen JC, et al: Microvascular invasion is a better predictor of tumor recurrence and overall survival following surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma compared to the Milan criteria. Ann Surg 254:108-1132011 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
7. Mazzaferro VLlovet JMMiceli R, et al: Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: A retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol 10:35-432009 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
8. Wang WGuo YZhong J, et al: The clinical significance of microvascular invasion in the surgical planning and postoperative sequential treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep 11:24152021 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
9. Liu YWang YGuo X, et al: Comparative effectiveness of adjuvant treatment for resected hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Oncol 11:7092782021 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
10. Lyu NKong YMu L, et al: Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin vs. sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69:60-692018 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
11. He MLi QZou R, et al: Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin vs sorafenib alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 5:953-9602019 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
12. He MKLe YLi QJ, et al: Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy using mFOLFOX versus transarterial chemoembolization for massive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective non-randomized study. Chin J Cancer 36:832017 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
13. Finn RSQin SIkeda M, et al: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 382:1894-19052020 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
14. Li SMei JWang Q, et al: Postoperative adjuvant transarterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFOX could improve outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion: A preliminary report of a phase III, randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol 27:5183-51902020 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
15. Shi MGuo RPLin XJ, et al: Partial hepatectomy with wide versus narrow resection margin for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:36-432007 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
16. Wei WJian PELi SH, et al: Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with solitary tumor and microvascular invasion: A randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Cancer Commun (Lond) 38:612018 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
17. Doig GSSimpson FRandomization and allocation concealment: A practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care 20:187-1912005; discussion 191-193 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
18. Li SMei JWang Q, et al: Transarterial infusion chemotherapy with FOLFOX for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center propensity score matched analysis of real-world practice. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 10:631-6452021 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
19. Zhou WPLai ECLi AJ, et al: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for resectable large hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 249:195-2022009 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
20. Shaohua LQiaoxuan WPeng S, et al: Surgical strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal/hepatic vein tumor thrombosis. PLoS One 10:e01300212015 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
21. Wileyto EPLi YChen J, et al: Assessing the fit of parametric cure models. Biostatistics 14:340-3502013 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
22. Wang JHe XDYao N, et al: A meta-analysis of adjuvant therapy after potentially curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Can J Gastroenterol 27:351-3632013 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
23. Lau WYLai ECLau SHThe current role of neoadjuvant/adjuvant/chemoprevention therapy in partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 8:124-1332009 MedlineGoogle Scholar
24. Sun JJWang KZhang CZ, et al: Postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after R0 hepatectomy improves outcomes of patients who have hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1344-13512016 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
25. Qin SBai YLim HY, et al: Randomized, multicenter, open-label study of oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin versus doxorubicin as palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma from Asia. J Clin Oncol 31:3501-35082013 LinkGoogle Scholar
26. Xing HSun LYYan WT, et al: Repeat hepatectomy for patients with early and late recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis. Surgery 169:911-9202021 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
27. Hu ZZhou JLi Z, et al: Time interval to recurrence as a predictor of overall survival in salvage liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis B virus. Surgery 157:239-2482015 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
28. Shi MLu LGFang WQ, et al: Roles played by chemolipiodolization and embolization in chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Single-blind, randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:59-682013 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
29. Schwartz JDSchwartz MMandeli J, et al: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Review of the randomised clinical trials. Lancet Oncol 3:593-6032002 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar

Plaats een reactie ...

Reageer op "HAIC - Hepatische Arteriële Infusie Chemotherapie met FOLFOX na operatie bij primaire leverkanker met microvasculaire invasie verdubbelt mediane overall overleving van 10 maanden naar 20 maanden."


Gerelateerde artikelen
 

Gerelateerde artikelen

Ablatietechnieken: Wanneer >> Chemo: Regorafenib na progressie >> HAIC - Hepatische Arteriële >> HIFU - High Dose Focused Ultrasound >> Histotripsy, een vorm van >> Immuuntherapie met anti-PD >> Interferonvrij, direct werkend >> Intra-arteriele I-lipiodol >> Nanotherapie in combinatie >> Operatie: Levertumoren groter >>