Zie ook in gerelateerde artikelen.

9 december 2022: Bron: JAMA 6 december 2022

Legalisatie van medische marihuana - cannabis blijkt een gunstige invloed te hebben bij volwassenen tot 65 jaar die worden behandeld voor nieuw gediagnosticeerde vormen van kanker. Uit een studie uitgevoerd bij gegevens van 38.189 patiënten met nieuw gediagnosticeerde borstkanker (100 procent vrouwen); 12.816 met darmkanker (55,4 procent mannen); en 7.190 met longkanker (51,1 procent vrouwen) bleek minder morfine nodig als pijnstilling (5 tot 20 procent minder) en werden er minder ziekenhuisopnames die aan pijn gerelateerd waren gezien bij de marihuana - cannabis gebruikers. Deze zogeheten cross-sectionele studie is op 1 december online gepubliceerd in JAMA Oncology.

De onderzoekers ontdekten dat legalisatie van medicinale marihuana geassocieerd was met een vermindering van het aantal opioïdendagen bij patiënten met borstkanker met recente opioïden, met darmkanker met recente opioïden en met longkanker zonder recente opioïden (verschil, 5,6 en 4,9 en respectievelijk 6,5 procentpunt). Onder patiënten met longkanker met recente opioïden ging legalisatie van medicinale marihuana gepaard met een vermindering van het aantal pijngerelateerde ziekenhuisgebeurtenissen (verschil, 6,3 procentpunten).
"De bevindingen suggereren dat medische marihuana tot op zekere hoogte zou kunnen dienen als vervanging voor opioïden", schrijven de auteurs.

Conclusie van de studie:

Uit deze cross-sectionele studie bleek dat de legalisatie van medicinale marihuana tussen 2012 en 2017 in verband werd gebracht met een afname van de verstrekking van opioïden en pijn gerelateerde ziekenhuisgebeurtenissen bij sommige particulier verzekerde patiënten van 18 tot 64 jaar die een behandeling tegen kanker kregen. De bevindingen suggereren dat medicinale marihuana tot op zekere hoogte zou kunnen dienen als vervanging voor opioïden. Toekomstige studies moeten de aard van de associaties en hun implicaties voor patiëntuitkomsten ophelderen.

Het volledige studierapport is gratis in te zien of te downloaden. Klik op de titel van het abstract:

Key Points

Question  Is medical marijuana legalization associated with opioid-related and pain-related outcomes for adult patients newly diagnosed with cancer and receiving anticancer treatment?

Findings  This cross-sectional study of 38 189 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, 12 816 with colorectal cancer, and 7190 with lung cancer found that medical marijuana legalization implemented between 2012 and 2017 was associated with a 5.5% to 19.2% relative reduction in the rate of opioid dispensing.

Meaning  Medical marijuana could be serving as a substitute for opioid therapies among some adult patients receiving cancer treatment; future studies need to elucidate the nature of the associations and implications for patient outcomes.

Abstract

Importance  The past decade saw rapid declines in opioids dispensed to patients with active cancer, with a concurrent increase in marijuana use among cancer survivors possibly associated with state medical marijuana legalization.

Objective  To assess the associations between medical marijuana legalization and opioid-related and pain-related outcomes for adult patients receiving cancer treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cross-sectional study used 2012 to 2017 national commercial claims data and a difference-in-differences design to estimate the associations of interest for patients residing in 34 states without medical marijuana legalization by January 1, 2012. Secondary analysis differentiated between medical marijuana legalization with and without legal allowances for retail dispensaries. Data analysis was conducted between December 2021 and August 2022. Study samples included privately insured patients aged 18 to 64 years who received anticancer treatment during the 6 months after a new breast (in women), colorectal, or lung cancer diagnosis.

Exposures  State medical marijuana legalization that took effect between 2012 and 2017.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Having 1 or more days of opioids, 1 or more days of long-acting opioids, total morphine milligram equivalents of any opioid dispensed to patients with 1 or more opioid days, and 1 or more pain-related emergency department visits or hospitalizations (hereafter, hospital events) during the 6 months after a new cancer diagnosis. Interaction terms were included between each policy indicator and an indicator of recent opioids, defined as having 1 or more opioid prescriptions during the 12 months before the new cancer diagnosis. Logistic models were estimated for dichotomous outcomes, and generalized linear models were estimated for morphine milligram equivalents.

Results  The analysis included 38 189 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer (38 189 women [100%]), 12 816 with colorectal cancer (7100 men [55.4%]), and 7190 with lung cancer (3674 women [51.1%]). Medical marijuana legalization was associated with a reduction in the rate of 1 or more opioid days from 90.1% to 84.4% (difference, 5.6 [95% CI, 2.2-9.0] percentage points; P = .001) among patients with breast cancer with recent opioids, from 89.4% to 84.4% (difference, 4.9 [95% CI, 0.5-9.4] percentage points; P = .03) among patients with colorectal cancer with recent opioids, and from 33.8% to 27.2% (difference, 6.5 [95% CI, 1.2-11.9] percentage points; P = .02) among patients with lung cancer without recent opioids. Medical marijuana legalization was associated with a reduction in the rate of 1 or more pain-related hospital events from 19.3% to 13.0% (difference, 6.3 [95% CI, 0.7-12.0] percentage points; P = .03) among patients with lung cancer with recent opioids.

Conclusions and Relevance  Findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that medical marijuana legalization implemented from 2012 to 2017 was associated with a lower rate of opioid dispensing and pain-related hospital events among some adults receiving treatment for newly diagnosed cancer. The nature of these associations and their implications for patient safety and quality of life need to be further investigated.


Article Information

Accepted for Publication: September 12, 2022.

Published Online: December 1, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5623

Corresponding Author: Yuhua Bao, PhD, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E 61st St, New York, NY 10065 (yub2003@med.cornell.edu).

Author Contributions: Dr Bao had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Bao, Wen.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Bao, Zhang, Bruera, Portenoy, Rosa, Reid, Wen.

Drafting of the manuscript: Bao.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bao, Zhang, Portenoy, Bruera, Portenoy, Rosa, Reid, Wen.

Statistical analysis: Bao, Zhang.

Obtained funding: Bao.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Bao.

Supervision: Bao.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Bao reported receiving grants from Arnold Ventures and the National Institute on Drug Abuse during the conduct of the study. Dr Rosa reported receiving grants from the Cambia Health Foundation and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, consulting fees from Sunstone Therapies, and royalties from Springer Publishing outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by grants from Arnold Ventures (Drs Bao and Zhang) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant P30DA040500, Dr Bao).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Meeting Presentation: Data in this article were presented as a poster at the 2022 ISPOR Europe Conference; November 6-9, 2022; Vienna, Austria.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Cancer Institute.

Additional Contributions: The authors acknowledge the assistance of the Health Care Cost Institute and its data contributors—Aetna, Humana, and UnitedHealthcare—in providing the claims data analyzed in this study. Philip J. Jeng, MS, conducted original legal research related to medical marijuana legalization and policies governing prescription drug monitoring programs. Kayla Hutchings, BA, provided editorial and administrative assistance. Both are from the Department of Population Health Sciences at Weill Cornell Medicine. Neither received compensation beyond their salaries.

References
1.
van den Beuken-van Everdingen  MHJ, Hochstenbach  LMJ, Joosten  EAJ, Tjan-Heijnen  VCG, Janssen  DJA.  Update on prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.   J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016;51(6):1070-1090.e9. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Swarm  RA, Paice  JA, Anghelescu  DL,  et al.  Adult cancer pain, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology.   J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(8):977-1007. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0038PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Fallon  M, Giusti  R, Aielli  F,  et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee.  Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.   Ann Oncol. 2018;29(suppl 4):iv166-iv191. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy152PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Caraceni  A, Hanks  G, Kaasa  S,  et al; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC); European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC).  Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC.   Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(2):e58-e68. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70040-2PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Roberto  A, Greco  MT, Uggeri  S,  et al.  Living systematic review to assess the analgesic undertreatment in cancer patients.   Pain Pract. 2022;22(4):487-496. doi:10.1111/papr.13098PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Dowell  D, Haegerich  TM, Chou  R.  CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016.   MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(1):1-49. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
US Department of Health and Human Services. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention letter regarding opioid guideline clarification. February 28, 2019. Accessed June 20, 2022. https://www.asco.org/sites/new-www.asco.org/files/content-files/advocacy-and-policy/documents/2019-CDC-Opioid-Guideline-Clarification-Letter-to-ASCO-ASH-NCCN.pdf
8.
Enzinger  AC, Ghosh  K, Keating  NL, Cutler  DM, Landrum  MB, Wright  AA.  US trends in opioid access among patients with poor prognosis cancer near the end-of-life.   J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(26):2948-2958. doi:10.1200/JCO.21.00476PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Yennurajalingam  S, Lu  Z, Reddy  SK,  et al.  Patterns of opioid prescription, use, and costs among patients with advanced cancer and inpatient palliative care between 2008 and 2014.   J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(1):e74-e83. doi:10.1200/JOP.18.00205PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Haider  A, Zhukovsky  DS, Meng  YC,  et al.  Opioid prescription trends among patients with cancer referred to outpatient palliative care over a 6-year period.   J Oncol Pract. 2017;13(12):e972-e981. doi:10.1200/JOP.2017.024901PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Zhang  H, Paice  J, Portenoy  R, Bruera  E, Reid  MC, Bao  Y.  Prescription opioids dispensed to patients with cancer with bone metastasis: 2011-2017.   Oncologist. 2021;26(10):e1890-e1892. doi:10.1002/onco.13898PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Bahji  A, Stephenson  C.  International perspectives on the implications of cannabis legalization: a systematic review & thematic analysis.   Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(17):E3095. doi:10.3390/ijerph16173095PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Portenoy  RK, Ganae-Motan  ED, Allende  S,  et al.  Nabiximols for opioid-treated cancer patients with poorly-controlled chronic pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled, graded-dose trial.   J Pain. 2012;13(5):438-449. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.01.003PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Johnson  JR, Burnell-Nugent  M, Lossignol  D, Ganae-Motan  ED, Potts  R, Fallon  MT.  Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of THC:CBD extract and THC extract in patients with intractable cancer-related pain.   J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(2):167-179. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.008PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Wilkie  G, Sakr  B, Rizack  T.  Medical marijuana use in oncology: a review.   JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(5):670-675. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0155
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.  The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. National Academies Press; 2017.
17.
Mohiuddin  M, Blyth  FM, Degenhardt  L,  et al.  General risks of harm with cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicine possibly relevant to patients receiving these for pain management: an overview of systematic reviews.   Pain. 2021;162(suppl 1):S80-S96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Paice  JA, Portenoy  R, Lacchetti  C,  et al.  Management of chronic pain in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline.   J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(27):3325-3345. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.68.5206PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
IASP Presidential Task Force on Cannabis and Cannabinoid Analgesia.  International Association for the Study of Pain Presidential Task Force on Cannabis and Cannabinoid Analgesia position statement.   Pain. 2021;162(suppl 1):S1-S2.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Tringale  KR, Huynh-Le  M-P, Salans  M, Marshall  DC, Shi  Y, Hattangadi-Gluth  JA.  The role of cancer in marijuana and prescription opioid use in the United States: a population-based analysis from 2005 to 2014.   Cancer. 2019;125(13):2242-2251. doi:10.1002/cncr.32059PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
National Conference of State Legislatures. State medical marijuana laws. September 12, 2022. Accessed October 20, 2022. https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/state-medical-marijuana-laws.aspx
22.
Bradford  AC, Bradford  WD.  Medical marijuana laws reduce prescription medication use in Medicare Part D.   Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(7):1230-1236. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1661PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Bradford  AC, Bradford  WD.  Medical marijuana laws may be associated with a decline in the number of prescriptions for Medicaid enrollees.   Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(5):945-951. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1135PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Shi  Y.  Medical marijuana policies and hospitalizations related to marijuana and opioid pain reliever.   Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;173:144-150. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.006PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Kim  JH, Santaella-Tenorio  J, Mauro  C,  et al.  State medical marijuana laws and the prevalence of opioids detected among fatally injured drivers.   Am J Public Health. 2016;106(11):2032-2037. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303426PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Bachhuber  MA, Saloner  B, Cunningham  CO, Barry  CL.  Medical cannabis laws and opioid analgesic overdose mortality in the United States, 1999-2010.   JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(10):1668-1673. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4005
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Powell  D, Pacula  RL, Jacobson  M.  Do medical marijuana laws reduce addictions and deaths related to pain killers?   J Health Econ. 2018;58:29-42. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.12.007PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Do  EK, Ksinan  AJ, Kim  SJ, Del Fabbro  EG, Fuemmeler  BF.  Cannabis use among cancer survivors in the United States: analysis of a nationally representative sample.   Cancer. 2021;127(21):4040-4049. doi:10.1002/cncr.33794PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Cousins  MM, Jannausch  ML, Coughlin  LN, Jagsi  R, Ilgen  MA.  Prevalence of cannabis use among individuals with a history of cancer in the United States.   Cancer. 2021;127(18):3437-3444. doi:10.1002/cncr.33646PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Poghosyan  H, Poghosyan  A.  Marijuana use among cancer survivors: quantifying prevalence and identifying predictors.   Addict Behav. 2021;112:106634. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106634PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Siegel  RL, Miller  KD, Fuchs  HE, Jemal  A.  Cancer statistics, 2022.   CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7-33. doi:10.3322/caac.21708PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Health Care Cost Institute. 2022. Accessed April 29, 2022. https://healthcostinstitute.org/data
33.
Freisthler  B, Gruenewald  PJ.  Examining the relationship between the physical availability of medical marijuana and marijuana use across fifty California cities.   Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;143:244-250. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.036PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Pacula  RL, Powell  D, Heaton  P, Sevigny  EL.  Assessing the effects of medical marijuana laws on marijuana use: the devil is in the details.   J Policy Anal Manage. 2015;34(1):7-31. doi:10.1002/pam.21804PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
RAND Corporation. OPTIC-vetted policy data sets. Accessed June 20, 2022. https://www.rand.org/health-care/centers/optic/resources/datasets.html
36.
Haffajee  RL, Mello  MM, Zhang  F, Zaslavsky  AM, Larochelle  MR, Wharam  JF.  Four states with robust prescription drug monitoring programs reduced opioid dosages.   Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(6):964-974. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1321PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Buchmueller  TC, Carey  C.  The effect of prescription drug monitoring programs on opioid utilization in Medicare.   Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2018;10(1):77-112. doi:10.1257/pol.20160094Google ScholarCrossref
38.
Bao  Y, Wen  K, Johnson  P, Jeng  PJ, Meisel  ZF, Schackman  BR.  Assessing the impact of state policies for prescription drug monitoring programs on high-risk opioid prescriptions.   Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(10):1596-1604. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0512PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Wen  H, Hockenberry  JM, Jeng  PJ, Bao  Y.  Prescription drug monitoring program mandates: impact on opioid prescribing and related hospital use.   Health Aff (Millwood). 2019;38(9):1550-1556. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00103PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Wen  K, Johnson  P, Jeng  PJ, Schackman  BR, Bao  Y.  State policies for prescription drug monitoring programs and adverse opioid-related hospital events.   Med Care. 2020;58(7):610-616. doi:10.1097/MLR.0000000000001322PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Graetz  I, Yarbrough  CR, Hu  X, Howard  DH.  Association of mandatory-access prescription drug monitoring programs with opioid prescriptions among Medicare patients treated by a medical or hematologic oncologist.   JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(7):1102-1103. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0804
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Zhang  H, Kilaru  AS, Meisel  ZF, Bao  Y.  Prescription drug monitoring program mandates and opioids dispensed following emergency department encounters for patients with sickle cell disease or cancer with bone metastasis.   JAMA. 2021;326(3):274-276. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.10161
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data resources. Reviewed June 4, 2021. Accessed May 2, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/opioids/data-resources/index.html
44.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. QualityNet: chemotherapy measure. Accessed May 2, 2022. https://qualitynet.cms.gov/outpatient/measures/chemotherapy
45.
Bao  Y, Pan  Y, Taylor  A,  et al.  Prescription drug monitoring programs are associated with sustained reductions in opioid prescribing by physicians.   Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(6):1045-1051. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1673PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Moyo  P, Simoni-Wastila  L, Griffin  BA,  et al.  Impact of prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) on opioid utilization among Medicare beneficiaries in 10 US States.   Addiction. 2017;112(10):1784-1796. doi:10.1111/add.13860PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Patrick  SW, Fry  CE, Jones  TF, Buntin  MB.  Implementation of prescription drug monitoring programs associated with reductions in opioid-related death rates.   Health Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(7):1324-1332. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1496PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Manning  WG, Basu  A, Mullahy  J.  Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data.   J Health Econ. 2005;24(3):465-488. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.011PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Tyson  DM, Chavez  MN, Lake  P,  et al.  Perceptions of prescription opioid medication within the context of cancer survivorship and the opioid epidemic.   J Cancer Surviv. 2021;15(4):585-596. doi:10.1007/s11764-020-00952-1PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Rønne  ST, Rosenbæk  F, Pedersen  LB,  et al.  Physicians’ experiences, attitudes, and beliefs towards medical cannabis: a systematic literature review.   BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):212. doi:10.1186/s12875-021-01559-wPubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Braun  IM, Wright  A, Peteet  J,  et al.  Medical oncologists’ beliefs, practices, and knowledge regarding marijuana used therapeutically: a nationally representative survey study.   J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(19):1957-1962. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.1221PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Pergam  SA, Woodfield  MC, Lee  CM,  et al.  Cannabis use among patients at a comprehensive cancer center in a state with legalized medicinal and recreational use.   Cancer. 2017;123(22):4488-4497. doi:10.1002/cncr.30879PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
53.
Merlin  JS, Althouse  A, Feldman  R,  et al.  Analysis of state cannabis laws and dispensary staff recommendations to adults purchasing medical cannabis.   JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(9):e2124511. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24511
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
54.
Rowe  C, Vittinghoff  E, Santos  G-M, Behar  E, Turner  C, Coffin  PO.  Performance measures of diagnostic codes for detecting opioid overdose in the emergency department.   Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(4):475-483. doi:10.1111/acem.13121PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
55.
Jones  KF, Abdulhay  LB, Orris  SR, Merlin  JS, Schenker  Y, Bulls  HW.  The relevance of state laws regulating opioid prescribing for people living with serious illness.   J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022;64(2):89-99. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.05.001PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref




Plaats een reactie ...

Reageer op "Legalisatie van medische marihuana gunstig voor kankerpatiënten. Minder morfine nodig en minder aan pijn gerelateerde ziekenhuisopnames"


Gerelateerde artikelen
 

Gerelateerde artikelen

Legalisatie van medische marihuana >> Medicinale cannabis verlicht >> UMCG Groningen gaat onderzoek >> Nieuwe overzichtsstudie van >> Medicinale wiet (cannabis >> Cannabis gebruik met hoge >> Recreatief gebruik van marihuana >> 80 procent van amerikaanse >> DE WATERKOKER VAN MIJN TANTE >> Waar kan ik marihuana of >>