22 juli 2026: Bron: GUT microbes, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology. Met dank aan Marina die me deze studie doorstuurde.

Ewingella americana een van nature voorkomende bacterie in de darmen van de Japanse boomkikker Dryophytes japonicus heeft in een studie met muizen met darmtumoren 100 procent complete remissies opgeleverd met 1 intraveneuze injectie. Ter vergelijking andere behandelingen waaronder immuuntherapie met anti-PD medicijnen die de onderzoekers ook onderzochten als controlegroep leverden nul complete remissies op. Bovendien infecteerde de Ewingella americana geen normale organen en gaf geen ernstige bijwerkingen te zien. De lever, milt, nieren bleven allemaal schoon. Blijkbaar zoeken de bacteriën alleen kwaadaardige tumorcellen om zich in te nestelen en vermenigvuldigen.

De bacteriën verdwenen binnen ongeveer een uur uit de bloedbaan en waren binnen 24 uur volledig verdwenen. Geen chronische bijwerkingen. Slechts een milde voorbijgaande ontsteking die binnen 72 uur verdween.
Terwijl de bacteriën de tumor letterlijk van binnenuit opeten, blijken ze ook het immuunsysteem duurzaam te herstellen. De onderzoekers deden ook proeven maanden later en injecteerden muizen opnieuw met darmkankercellen en het immuunsysteem reageerde direct en vernietigde de tumorcellen.

De werking van de Ewingella americana ging als volgt.

De Ewingella americana zocht binnen 24 uur de kwaadaardige tumorcellen op, vermenigvuldigde razendsnel - 3000 keer - binnen de tumorcellen en blies deze van binnenuit op. De bacteriën sturen T-cellen, B-cellen en neutrofielen naar de locatie van de kwaadaardige tumor, waardoor een “koude” tumor (een tumor die het immuunsysteem negeert) verandert in een “hete” tumor die daarmee dus doelwit wordt van het immuunsysteem. De bevindingen wijzen op een veelbelovende nieuwe vorm van kankertherapie die op een dag effectief zou kunnen zijn tegen veel solide tumoren, aldus de onderzoekers van van het Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JAIST).

Hier een grafiek hoe het proces verliep tijdens de studies gekopieerd uit het studieverslag dat gedetailleerd en uitgebreid beschrijft hoe zij te werk zijn gegaan:

Figure 2.

Het studieverslag is gratis in te zien en gepubliceerd in GUTS microbes:

. 2025 Dec 10;17(1):2599562. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2599562

ABSTRACT

The utilization of gut microbiota in cancer therapy has attracted considerable attention as an emerging therapeutic frontier. In this study, we systematically evaluated the antitumor effects of nine bacterial strains isolated from the intestines of amphibians (Dryophytes japonicus and Cynops pyrrhogaster) and a reptile (Takydromus tachydromoides). Among the isolates, Ewingella americana exhibited remarkably potent cytotoxic activity with selective tumor-targeting ability characteristic of facultative anaerobic bacteria. Mechanistic investigations revealed that E. americana functions through a dual-action mechanism: direct tumor cell killing and robust activation of host immunity, leading to enhanced T cell, neutrophil, and B cell-mediated tumor attack. Treatment with E. americana significantly outperformed standard therapies, including anti-PD-L1 antibody and doxorubicin, in tumor regression studies. Importantly, comprehensive safety evaluations in murine models demonstrated that the gut-derived E. americana strain exhibits minimal pathogenicity and exerts no significant adverse effects at therapeutically effective doses, contrasting favorably with genetically modified bacterial therapeutics. Comparative analysis revealed superior therapeutic efficacy of E. americana over conventional treatments while maintaining an excellent safety profile. These findings suggest that gut microbiomes of lower vertebrates harbor numerous uncharacterized bacterial species with exceptional therapeutic potential. Our study establishes a foundation for developing naturally occurring, non-pathogenic bacterial therapeutics and underscores the critical importance of microbial biodiversity in advancing cancer treatment strategies.


On this page


Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Mitsuru Kawahara (JAIST) and Ms. Mariko Deguchi (JAIST) for their dedicated support for the animal experiments.

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (Grant number 23H00551), JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Research (Pioneering) (Grant number 25K21827), JSPS Program for Forming Japan’s Peak Research Universities (J-PEAKS) (Grant number JPJS00420230006), and the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Program for co-creating startup ecosystem (Grant Number JPMJSF2318). S. I. thanks to JST SPRING (Grant number JPMJSP2102).

Supplemental material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2025.2599562.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Author contributions

CRediT: Seigo Iwata: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Validation, Writing – original draft; Nagi Yamasita: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Validation; Kensuke Asukabe: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Validation; Matomo Sakari: Software, Formal analysis; Eijiro Miyako: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision.

Data and code availability statement

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are presented in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Michaudel C, Sokol H. The Gut microbiota at the service of immunometabolism. Cell Metab. 2020;32(4):514–523. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Quaglio AEV, Grillo TG, Oliveira ECS, Stasi LC, Sassaki LY. Gut microbiota, inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28(30):4053–4060. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gensollen T, Iyer SS, Kasper DL, Blumberg RS. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science. 2016;352:539–544. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ting NL, Lau HC, Yu J. Cancer pharmacomicrobiomics: targeting microbiota to optimise cancer therapy outcomes. Gut. 2022;71:1412–1425. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zheng D, Liwinski T, Elinav E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 2020;30:492–506. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dutta D, Lim SH. Bidirectional interaction between intestinal microbiome and cancer: opportunities for therapeutic interventions. Biomark Res. 2020;8:31. doi: 10.1186/s40364-020-00211-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Karwowska Z, Szemraj J, Karwowski B. Microbiota Alterations in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Appl Sci. 2020;10:585. doi: 10.3390/app10020585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cullin N, Antunes CA, Straussman R, Stein-Thoeringer CK, Elinav E. Microbiome and cancer. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:1317–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kaźmierczak-Siedlecka K, Daca A, Fic M, van de Wetering T, Folwarski M, Makarewicz W. Therapeutic methods of gut microbiota modification in colorectal cancer management – fecal microbiota transplantation, prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics. Gut Microbes. 2020;11(6):1518–1530. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1764309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zitvogel L, Daillère R, Roberti M, Routy B, Kroemer G. Anticancer effects of the microbiome and its products. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:465–478. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nobels A, van Marcke C, Jordan BF, Hul MV, Cani PD. The gut microbiome and cancer: from tumorigenesis to therapy. Nat. Metab. 2025;7:895–917. doi: 10.1038/s42255-025-01287-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L, Duong CPM, Alou MT, Daillère R, Fluckiger A, Messaoudene M, Rauber C, Roberti MP, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science. 2018;359:91–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mao J, Wang D, Long J, Yang X, Lin J, Song Y, Xie F, Xun Z, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Gut microbiome is associated with the clinical response to anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy in hepatobiliary cancers. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(12):e003334. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zheng Y, Wang T, Tu X, Huang Y, Zhang H, Tan D, Jiang W, Cai S, Zhao P, Song R, et al. Gut microbiome affects the response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Immunotherapy Cancer. 2019;7(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0650-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Goto Y, Iwata S, Miyahara M, Miyako E. Discovery of intratumoral oncolytic bacteria toward targeted anticancer theranostics. Adv Sci. 2023;10:23016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Iwata S, Nishiyama T, Sakari M, Doi Y, Takaya N, Ogitani Y, Nagano H, Fukuchi K, Miyako E. Tumour-resident oncolytic bacteria trigger potent anticancer effects through selective intratumoural thrombosis and necrosis. Nat Biomed Eng. 2025:1459. doi: 10.1038/s41551-025-01459-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chintalapati SSVV, Iwata S, Miyahara M, Miyako E. Tumor-isolated Cutibacterium acnes as an effective tumor suppressive living drug. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;170:116041. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.116041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rommasi F. Bacterial-based methods for cancer treatment: what we know and where we are. Oncol. Ther. 2022;10:23–54. doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00177-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sarotra P, Medhi B. Use of bacteria in cancer therapy. Current strategies in cancer gene therapy. 2017;209:111–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miyahara M, Doi Y, Takaya N, Miyako E. Photocatalytic scaffolds enhance anticancer performances of bacterial consortium AUN. Chem Eng J. 2024;499:156378. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.156378. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chintalapati S, Sang N, Miyahara M, Iwata S, Nishida K, Miyako E. Living drugs: a wonderful evolution for therapeutic applications. Cell Biomater. 2025;1:100193. doi: 10.1016/j.celbio.2025.100193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dieterich W, Schink M, Zopf Y. Microbiota in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Med Sci. 2018;6:116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sommer F, Backhed F. The gut microbiota-Masters of host development and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:227–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.O’Hara AM, Shanahan F. The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:688–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Torres-Dimas E, Cruz-Ramírez A, Bermúdez-Cruz RM. Cancer in amphibia, a rare phenomenon? Cell. Biology. International. 2022;46:1992–1998. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brown J, Wilson W.. Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:437–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Luo CH, Huang CT, Su CH, Yeh CS. Bacteria-mediated hypoxia-specific delivery of nanoparticles for tumors imaging and therapy. Nano Lett. 2016;16(6):3493–3499. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ioannou P, Baliou S, Kofteridis D. Ewingella americana infections in humans—A narrative review. Antibiotics. 2024;13:559. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Esposito S, Miconi F, Molinari D, Savarese E, Celi F, Marchese L, Valloscuro S, Principi N. What is the role of Ewingella americana in humans? A case report in a healthy 4-year-old girl. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:386. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4021-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dong H, Strome S, Salomao D, Tamura H, Hirano F, Flies DB, Roche PC, Lu J, Zhu G, Tamada K, et al. Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat Med. 2002;8:793–800. doi: 10.1038/nm730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lee D, Cho M, Kim E, Seo Y, Cha J. PD-L1: from cancer immunotherapy to therapeutic implications in multiple disorders. Mol Ther. 2024;32(12):4235–4255. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chatterjee S, Lesniak WG, Gabrielson M, Lisok A, Wharram B, Sysa-Shah P, Azad BB, Pomper MG, Nimmagadda S. A humanized antibody for imaging immune checkpoint ligand PD-L1 expression in tumors. Oncotarget. 2016;7:10215–10227. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xiaoming D, Yang G, Wenyi W. Post-translational regulations of PD-L1 and PD-1: mechanisms and opportunities for combined immunotherapy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;85:246–252. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nicoletto RE, Ofner CM. Cytotoxic mechanisms of doxorubicin at clinically relevant concentrations in breast cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2022;89:285–311. doi: 10.1007/s00280-022-04400-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Suzuki F, Hashimoto K, Kikuchi H, Nishikawa H, Matsumoto H, Shimada J, Kawase M, Sunaga K, Tsuda T, Satoh K, et al. Induction of tumor-specific cytotoxicity and apoptosis by doxorubicin. Anticancer Res. 2005;25:887–893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu L, Xu S, Wang H, Zhang J, Chen Z, Pan L, Wang J, Wei X, Xie H, Zhou L, et al. Enhancing the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin against hepatocellular carcinoma through a modular assembly approach: the combination of polymeric prodrug design, nanoparticle encapsulation, and cancer cell-specific drug targeting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(4):3229–3240. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b14496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chen J, Bai Y, Xue K, Li Z, Zhu Z, Yu C, Shen S, Qiao P, Luo Y, Dang E, et al. CREB1-driven CXCR4hi neutrophils promote skin inflammation in mouse models and human patients. Nat Commun. 2023;14:5894. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41484-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Aspalter RM, Eibl MM, Wolf HM. Regulation of TCR-mediated T cell activation by TNF-RII. J Leukoc Biol. 2003;74(4):572–582. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0303112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu Y, Wang Y, Yang Y, Weng L, Wu Q, Zhang J, Zhao P, Fang L, Shi Y, Wang P. Emerging phagocytosis checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:104. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01365-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Huang C-Y, Ye Z-H, Huang M-Y, Lu J-J. Regulation of CD47 expression in cancer cells. Transl Oncol. 2020;13:100862. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dang LH, Bettegowda C, Huso DL, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Combination bacteriolytic therapy for the treatment of experimental tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(2010):15155–15160. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251543698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(2010):373–384. doi: 10.1038/ni.1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Coffelt SB, Wellenstein MD, de Visser KE. Neutrophils in cancer: neutral no more. Nat Rev Cancer. 2026;16:431–446. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sharma P, Hu-Lieskovan S, Wargo JA, Ribas A. Primary, adaptive, and acquired resistance to cancer immunotherapy. Cell. 2017;168(2017):707–723. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zheng JH, Nguyen VH, Jiang S, Park S, Tan W, Hong SH, Shin MG, Chung I, Bom H, Choy HE, et al. Two-step enhanced cancer immunotherapy with engineered Salmonella typhimurium secreting heterologous flagellin. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9 eaak9537. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aak9537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Type Strains Genome Database. Available from: https://gctype.wdcm.org/.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

Supplementary_Information_Iwata_et_al_without_Highlights

Supplementary material

Supplementary_Data_1_Iwata_et_al

Data Availability Statement

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are presented in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Gut Microbes are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis









Plaats een reactie ...

Reageer op "Ewingella americana een bacterie uit de darmen van de Japanse boomkikker Dryophytes japonicus geeft bij muizen met darmtumoren met 1 intraveneuze injectie 100 procent duurzame complete remissies en versterkt het immuunsysteem"


Gerelateerde artikelen
 

Gerelateerde artikelen

Ewingella americana een bacterie >> CRISPR-Cas9 bewerkte T-cellen >> Darmkanker: TKR remmer Tucatinib >> Darmkanker: RAS test komt >> Darmkanker: Dieet heeft grote >> DNA mutaties komen 3x zo vaak >> lenvatinib samen met pembrolizumab >> Mutaties in andere genen - >> Onvansertib naast standaard >> Pembrolizumab brengt vrouw >>