Zie ook artikelen met Durvalumab in de titel op onze website: https://kanker-actueel.nl/NL/search.html?search_text=durvalumab&search_in=title

Zie ook artikelen op onze website met BCG in de titel: https://kanker-actueel.nl/NL/search.html?search_text=BCG&search_in=title

1 juli 2026: Bron: FDA, Persbericht Astazeneca, Fase III studie Protomac

Durvalumab (IMFINZI®) geeft in combinatie met BCG = Bacillus Calmette-Guerrin uitstekende resultaten op 1 jaars meting als combinatiebehandeling bij patiënten met BCG-naïeve, dus nog niet behandeld met BCG, hoogrisico niet-spierinvasieve blaaskanker met een vermindering van 32 procent in het risico op een recidief of  ziekteprogressie of overlijden na een operatie. Dat blijkt uit de resultaten zoals die zijn geanalyseerd in de fase III Protomac studie in vergelijking met standaard eerstelijns behandeling of beste behandeling naar keuze van de behandelend uroloog of oncoloog.

Een citaat vertaalt uit het persbericht van Astrazeneca:

In de Protomac studie werden 1018 patiënten 1:1:1 gerandomiseerd om of Durvalumab (IMFINZI®) plus BCG te krijgen inclusief onderhoudstherapie, of Durvalumab (IMFINZI®) plus alleen BCG-inductietherapie, versus alleen BCG-inductie- en onderhoudstherapie. In de Protomac studie ontvingen patiënten zes weken BC-inductietherapie met of zonder twee jaar BCG-onderhoudstherapie. Met een mediane follow-up voor ziektevrije progressie van meer dan vijf jaar, kenmerkt de Protomac studie zich door een opmerkelijk lange observatieperiode in vergelijking met andere studies naar niet-spierinvasieve blaaskanker.

De studie werd uitgevoerd in meer dan 120 centra in 12 landen, waaronder Canada, Australië en andere landen in Europa en Azië. Het primaire eindpunt was ziekteprogressievrije overleving, gedefinieerd als de tijd vanaf de gerandomiseerde indeling tot de datum van het eerste recidief, progressie van de ziekte of overlijden door welke oorzaak dan ook, voor Durvalumab (IMFINZI®) plus BCG-inductie- en onderhoudstherapie vergeleken met BCG-inductie- en onderhoudstherapie alleen.

Secundaire eindpunten waren ziekteprogressievrije tijd voor Durvalumab (IMFINZI®) plus BCG-inductie- en onderhoudstherapie alleen versus de controlegroep, evenals overall overleving na vijf jaar en veiligheid in beide groepen van de studie.

Het volledige studierapport is gratis in te zien tegen bepaalde voorwaarden, klik daarvoor op de titel van het abstract zoals gepubliceerd in the Lancet:

Articles Volume 406, Issue 10516 p2221-2234 November 08, 2025

Durvalumab in combination with BCG for BCG-naive, high-risk, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (POTOMAC): final analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Affiliations & Notes
aDepartment of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
bDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
cDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
dDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
eClinical Research Center, Poznań, Poland
fSaint Petersburg Hospital of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint Petersburg, Russia
gNorth-Western State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
hDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
iKrasnoyarsk State Medical University, Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Cancer Center, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
jDepartment of Urology, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan
kDepartments of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
lDepartment of Development and Regeneration, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
mMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
nUrologicum-Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany
oBarts Cancer Institute Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
pDepartment of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
qDepartment of Urology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
rIcon Cancer Centre Wesley, Auchenflower, QLD, Australia
sDepartment of Urology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
tCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec, Oncology Division, CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
uDepartment of Medical Oncology, St Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
vOncology Biometrics, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
wLate-stage Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
xLate-stage Development Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
ySTART Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
*
Former principal investigator.
*
Members listed in the appendix (p 11)
Affiliation at time of study
Article Info
Publication History:
Published October 17, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Linked Articles (1)
Cover Image - The Lancet, Volume 406, Issue 10516

Summary

Background

Patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) often have recurrence or progression after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) and subsequent BCG therapy. We aimed to evaluate whether 1 year of durvalumab with BCG could improve outcomes versus BCG alone for these patients.

Methods

This randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with BCG-naive, high-risk NMIBC who underwent TURBT. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to receive intravenous durvalumab (every 4 weeks for 13 cycles) plus intravesical BCG induction (weekly for 6 weeks) and maintenance (three doses at weekly intervals at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months), durvalumab plus BCG induction, or BCG induction and maintenance (comparison group). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed disease-free survival in the durvalumab plus BCG induction and maintenance group versus the comparison group in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03528694) and EudraCT (2017-002979-26) and is ongoing but is no longer enrolling patients.

Findings

Between June 18, 2018, and Oct 2, 2020, 1350 patients were assessed for eligibility, among whom 1018 patients were randomly allocated: 339 to the durvalumab plus BCG induction and maintenance group (of whom 336 [99%] initiated and 180 [53%] completed treatment), 339 to the durvalumab plus BCG induction group (337 [99%] initiated and 239 [71%] completed treatment), and 340 to the comparison group (339 [>99%] initiated and 182 [54%] completed treatment). At a median follow-up of 60·7 months (IQR 51·5–66·5), there were 67 (20%) disease-free survival events in the durvalumab plus BCG induction and maintenance group and 98 (29%) events in the comparison group, resulting in a 32% reduction in the risk of recurrence of high-risk disease or death by any cause with durvalumab plus BCG induction and maintenance versus the comparison group (hazard ratio 0·68 [95% CI 0·50–0·93]; log-rank p=0·015). Among patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 71 (21%) of 336 patients in the durvalumab plus BCG induction and maintenance group, 52 (15%) in the durvalumab plus BCG induction only group, and 13 (4%) of 339 patients in the comparison group. No treatment-related adverse events led to death.

Interpretation

Among patients with BCG-naive, high-risk NMIBC, 1 year of durvalumab combined with BCG induction and maintenance therapy showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival versus BCG induction and maintenance alone. The combination had a manageable safety profile, consistent with that of the individual therapies. These results support 1 year of durvalumab in combination with BCG induction and maintenance therapy as a potential new treatment for this patient population.


References

1.
Bray, F ∙ Laversanne, M ∙ Sung, H ∙ et al.
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024; 74:229-263
2.
Gontero, P ∙ Birtle, A ∙ Capoun, O ∙ et al.
European Association of Urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TaT1 and carcinoma in situ)—a summary of the 2024 guidelines update
Eur Urol. 2024; 86:531-549
3.
Porten, SP ∙ Cooperberg, MR
High-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: definition and epidemiology
Curr Opin Urol. 2012; 22:385-389
4.
Holzbeierlein, JM ∙ Bixler, BR ∙ Buckley, DI ∙ et al.
Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline: 2024 amendment
J Urol. 2024; 211:533-538
5.
Lenis, AT ∙ Lec, PM ∙ Chamie, K
Bladder cancer: a review
JAMA. 2020; 324:1980-1991
6.
Jiang, S ∙ Redelman-Sidi, G
BCG in bladder cancer immunotherapy
Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14, 3073
7.
Kamat, AM ∙ Sylvester, RJ ∙ Böhle, A ∙ et al.
Definitions, end points, and clinical trial designs for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: recommendations from the International Bladder Cancer Group
J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:1935-1944
8.
Ferro, M ∙ Barone, B ∙ Crocetto, F ∙ et al.
Predictive clinico-pathological factors to identify BCG, unresponsive patients, after re-resection for T1 high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Urol Oncol. 2022; 40:490.e13-490.e20
9.
Li, R ∙ Tabayoyong, WB ∙ Guo, CC ∙ et al.
Prognostic implication of the United States Food and Drug Administration-defined BCG-unresponsive disease
Eur Urol. 2019; 75:8-10
10.
Balar, AV ∙ Kamat, AM ∙ Kulkarni, GS ∙ et al.
Pembrolizumab monotherapy for the treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to BCG (KEYNOTE-057): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study
Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22:919-930
11.
Shore, ND ∙ Powles, TB ∙ Bedke, J ∙ et al.
Sasanlimab plus BCG in BCG-naive, high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: the randomised phase 3 CREST trial
Nat Med. 2025; 31:2806-2814
12.
Stewart, R ∙ Morrow, M ∙ Hammond, SA ∙ et al.
Identification and characterisation of MEDI4736, an antagonistic anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody
Cancer Immunol Res. 2015; 3:1052-1062
13.
Babjuk, M ∙ Böhle, A ∙ Burger, M ∙ et al.
EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016
Eur Urol. 2017; 71:447-461
14.
Powles, T ∙ Catto, JWF ∙ Galsky, MD ∙ et al., the NIAGARA Investigators
Perioperative durvalumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable bladder cancer
N Engl J Med. 2024; 391:1773-1786
15.
Chehroudi, AC ∙ Black, PC
Emerging intravesical therapies for the management of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: charting a path forward
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020; 14:204-213
16.
Kopenhafer, L ∙ Thompson, A ∙ Chang, J ∙ et al.
Patient experience and unmet needs in high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: insights from qualitative interviews and a cross-sectional survey
Urol Oncol. 2024; 42:70.e1-70.e10
17.
Mason, B ∙ Eccleston, A ∙ Gater, A ∙ et al.
PCR235 drivers of treatment preferences in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) patients: qualitative interviews to inform a patient-preference study
Value Health. 2023; 26:S494-S495
18.
Smith, A ∙ Gore, JL ∙ Chisolm, S ∙ et al.
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treatment selection in an emerging treatment era: a patient preference study
J Clin Oncol. 2025; 43:754
19.
Szabados, BE ∙ Guerrero-Ramos, F ∙ Grande, E ∙ et al.
On the horizon: a global multidisciplinary perspective on delivering emerging therapies for patients with BCG-naive high-risk NMIBC
Oncol Ther. 2025; 13:275-291
20.
Sylvester, RJ ∙ van der Meijden, AP ∙ Witjes, JA ∙ et al.
Bacillus Calmette-Guerin versus chemotherapy for the intravesical treatment of patients with carcinoma in situ of the bladder: a meta-analysis of the published results of randomized clinical trials
J Urol. 2005; 174:86-92
21.
Lamm, DL ∙ Blumenstein, BA ∙ Crissman, JD ∙ et al.
Maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy for recurrent TA, T1 and carcinoma in situ transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a randomized Southwest Oncology Group Study
J Urol. 2000; 163:1124-1129
22.
Oddens, J ∙ Brausi, M ∙ Sylvester, R ∙ et al.
Final results of an EORTC-GU cancers group randomized study of maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin in intermediate- and high-risk Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the urinary bladder: one-third dose versus full dose and 1 year versus 3 years of maintenance
Eur Urol. 2013; 63:462-472
23.
Kamat, AM ∙ Shore, N ∙ Hahn, N ∙ et al.
KEYNOTE-676: phase III study of BCG and pembrolizumab for persistent/recurrent high-risk NMIBC
Future Oncol. 2020; 16:507-516
24.
Necchi, A ∙ Catto, JWF ∙ Powles, TB ∙ et al.
2407TiP SunRISe-3: TAR-200 plus cetrelimab (CET) or TAR-200 versus intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in patients (pts) with BCG-naive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR NMIBC)
Ann Oncol. 2023; 34, S1224
25.
Roupret, M ∙ Neuzillet, Y ∙ Bertaut, A ∙ et al.
ALBAN: an open label, randomised, phase III trial, evaluating efficacy of atezolizumab in addition to one year BCG (bacillus Calmette-Guerin) bladder instillation in BCG-naive patients with high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (AFU-GETUG 37)
J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37, TPS4589
26.
Morgan, C ∙ Kurland, J ∙ Patel, M ∙ et al.
Differential safety profiles of durvalumab monotherapy and durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab in adult patients with advanced cancers
J Immunother Cancer. 2025; 13, e011140

Plaats een reactie ...

Reageer op "Durvalumab (IMFINZI) plus BCG = Bacillus Calmette-Guerin geeft bij patienten met BCG-naïeve, hoogrisico niet-spierinvasieve blaaskanker sterk verbeterde ziekteprogressievrije overleving van 32 procent"


Gerelateerde artikelen