Raadpleeg ook preventielijst niet-toxische middelen en behandelingen opgesteld door arts-bioloog drs. Engelbert Valstar
24 oktober 2022: JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):767-776.
Uit een groot Amerikaans bevolkingsonderzoek, The Adventist Health Study 2 (AHS-2) , blijkt dat mensen die hoofdzakelijk een vegetarisch dieet gebruiken minder risico hebben op het krijgen van darmkanker en/of rectumkanker in vergelijking met niet vegetariers. Vooral mensen die geen vlees maar naast groenten en fruit wel vis aten (pesco vegetariërs) hadden het minste risico darmkanker of rectumkanker te krijgen.
The Adventist Health Study 2 (AHS-2) is een grote, prospectieve, Noord-Amerikaanse cohortstudie met 96354 Zevende-dags Adventisten die tussen 1 januari 2002 en 31 december 2007 zijn gerekruteerd. Van deze deelnemers bleef een analytische steekproef van 77659 over na uitsluitingen.
Dieet werd bij aanvang beoordeeld door een gevalideerde kwantitatieve vragenlijst over voedselfrequentie en gecategoriseerd in 4 vegetarische voedingspatronen (veganistisch, lacto-ovo-vegetarisch, pescovegetarisch en semi-vegetarisch) en een niet-vegetarisch voedingspatroon.
De analyse werd uitgevoerd met behulp van Cox proportionele gevarenregressie, waarbij werd gecontroleerd voor belangrijke demografische en levensstijlverstorende factoren. De analyse werd uitgevoerd tussen 1 juni 2014 en 20 oktober 2014.
DIEETSTATUS van de deelnemers:
- 8% is veganistisch (geen rood vlees, vis, gevogelte, zuivel of eieren).
- 28% is lacto-ovo-vegetarisch (consumeert melk en/of eieren, maar geen rood vlees, vis of gevogelte).
- 10% is pesco-vegetarisch (eet vis, melk en eieren, maar geen rood vlees of gevogelte).
- 6% is semi-vegetarisch (eet minder dan één keer per week rood vlees, gevogelte en vis).
- 48% is niet-vegetarisch (eet meer dan eens per week rood vlees, gevogelte, vis, melk en eieren).
Resultaten zoals vertaald uit het abstract, maar in het volledige studieverslag staat alles tot in detail vermeld met bijbehorende grafieken:
Tijdens een gemiddelde follow-up van 7,3 jaar werden 380 gevallen van darmkanker en 110 gevallen van rectumkanker gedocumenteerd. De aangepaste hazard ratio's (HR's) bij alle vegetariërs samen versus niet-vegetariërs waren 0,78 (95% BI, 0,64-0,95) voor alle darmkankers, 0,81 (95% BI, 0,65-1,00) voor darmkanker en 0,71 (95% BI, 0,47-1,06) voor rectumkanker.
De aangepaste HR voor darmkanker bij veganisten was 0,84 (95% BI, 0,59-1,19); bij lacto-ovo-vegetariërs 0,82 (95% BI 0,65-1,02); bij pescovegetariërs 0,57 (95% BI 0,40-0,82); en bij semi-vegetariërs, 0,92 (95% BI, 0,62-1,37) vergeleken met niet-vegetariërs.
Effectschattingen waren vergelijkbaar voor mannen en vrouwen en voor zwarte en niet-zwarte personen.
Conclusies en relevantie:
Vegetarische diëten zijn geassocieerd met een algehele lagere incidentie van darmkankers. Vooral pescovegetariërs hebben een veel lager risico in vergelijking met niet-vegetariërs.
Het volledige studierapport is gratis in te zien of te downloaden. Klik op de titel van het abstract voor het studieverslag:
JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):767-776. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.59
Importance Colorectal cancers are a leading cause of cancer mortality, and their primary prevention by diet is highly desirable. The relationship of vegetarian dietary patterns to colorectal cancer risk is not well established.
Objective To evaluate the association between vegetarian dietary patterns and incident colorectal cancers.
Design, Setting, and Participants The Adventist Health Study 2 (AHS-2) is a large, prospective, North American cohort trial including 96 354 Seventh-Day Adventist men and women recruited between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2007. Follow-up varied by state and was indicated by the cancer registry linkage dates. Of these participants, an analytic sample of 77 659 remained after exclusions. Analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression, controlling for important demographic and lifestyle confounders. The analysis was conducted between June 1, 2014, and October 20, 2014.
Exposures Diet was assessed at baseline by a validated quantitative food frequency questionnaire and categorized into 4 vegetarian dietary patterns (vegan, lacto-ovo vegetarian, pescovegetarian, and semivegetarian) and a nonvegetarian dietary pattern.
Main Outcomes and Measures The relationship between dietary patterns and incident cancers of the colon and rectum; colorectal cancer cases were identified primarily by state cancer registry linkages.
Results During a mean follow-up of 7.3 years, 380 cases of colon cancer and 110 cases of rectal cancer were documented. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) in all vegetarians combined vs nonvegetarians were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.64-0.95) for all colorectal cancers, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.65-1.00) for colon cancer, and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.47-1.06) for rectal cancer. The adjusted HR for colorectal cancer in vegans was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.59-1.19); in lacto-ovo vegetarians, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.65-1.02); in pescovegetarians, 0.57 (95% CI, 0.40-0.82); and in semivegetarians, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.62-1.37) compared with nonvegetarians. Effect estimates were similar for men and women and for black and nonblack individuals.
Conclusions and Relevance Vegetarian diets are associated with an overall lower incidence of colorectal cancers. Pescovegetarians in particular have a much lower risk compared with nonvegetarians. If such associations are causal, they may be important for primary prevention of colorectal cancers.
Accepted for Publication: November 25, 2014.
Corresponding Author: Michael J. Orlich, MD, PhD, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, 24951 N Circle Dr, NH 2031, Loma Linda, CA 92350 (morlich@llu.edu).
Published Online: March 9, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.59.
Author Contributions: Dr Fraser had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: Orlich, Singh, Knutsen, Beeson, Jaceldo-Siegl.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Orlich, Sabaté, Fan, Sveen, Bennett, Knutsen, Beeson, Jaceldo-Siegl, Butler, Herring, Fraser.
Drafting of the manuscript: Orlich.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Singh, Sabaté, Fan, Sveen, Bennett, Knutsen, Beeson, Jaceldo-Siegl, Butler, Herring, Fraser.
Statistical analysis: Orlich, Singh, Fan.
Obtained funding: Knutsen, Fraser.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Sveen, Bennett, Herring, Fraser.
Study supervision: Sabaté, Knutsen, Fraser.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Orlich reports receiving a small honorarium from the Northern California Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists to partially defray travel expenses for a speaking engagement at which he gave an overview and update of Adventist Health Studies research and a small honorarium from the Southern California Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists for a speaking engagement at which he lectured on lifestyle approaches for chronic disease prevention. No other conflicts are reported.
Funding/Support: Project support was obtained from National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant 1U01CA152939 (Dr Fraser) and World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) grant 2009/93 (Dr Fraser).
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NCI, WCRF, or the participating cancer registries. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and endorsement by the NCI, WCRF, or their contractors or subcontractors is not intended nor should it be inferred.
Previous Presentation: The findings of this study were presented as a poster at the Society for Epidemiologic Research annual meeting; June 26, 2014; Seattle, Washington.
Additional Contributions: Cancer incidence data were provided by the Alabama State Cancer Registry, Alaska Cancer Registry, Arizona Cancer Registry, Arkansas Cancer Registry, California Cancer Registry, Colorado Cancer Registry, Connecticut Tumor Registry, District of Columbia Cancer Registry, Delaware Cancer Registry, Florida Cancer Data System, Georgia Department of Public Health, Hawaii Tumor Registry, Cancer Registry of Idaho, Illinois State Cancer Registry, Indiana State Cancer Registry, Iowa Cancer Registry, Kansas Cancer Registry, Kentucky Cancer Registry, Louisiana Tumor Registry, Maryland Cancer Registry, Massachusetts Cancer Registry, Michigan Cancer Surveillance System, Minnesota Cancer Surveillance System, Mississippi Cancer Registry, Missouri Cancer Registry and Research Center, Montana Central Tumor Registry, Nebraska Cancer Registry, Nevada Central Cancer Registry, New Hampshire State Cancer Registry, New Jersey State Cancer Registry, New Mexico Tumor Registry, New York State Cancer Registry, North Carolina Central Cancer Registry, North Dakota Statewide Cancer Registry, Cancer Data Registry of Ohio, Oklahoma Central Cancer Registry, Oregon State Cancer Registry, Pennsylvania Cancer Registry, Rhode Island Cancer Registry, South Carolina Cancer Registry, South Dakota Cancer Registry, Tennessee Cancer Registry, Texas Cancer Registry, Utah Cancer Registry (NCI contract HHSN261201300071), Vermont Cancer Registry, Virginia Cancer Registry, Washington State Cancer Registry, West Virginia Cancer Registry, and Wyoming Cancer Surveillance Program.
2.
World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Report: Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research; 2011.
3.
Cross AJ, Leitzmann MF, Gail MH, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Sinha R. A prospective study of red and processed meat intake in relation to cancer risk.
PLoS Med. 2007;4(12):e325. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040325.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Cross AJ, Ferrucci LM, Risch A, et al. A large prospective study of meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: an investigation of potential mechanisms underlying this association.
Cancer Res. 2010;70(6):2406-2414.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Norat T, Bingham S, Ferrari P, et al. Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(12):906-916.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Chan DSM, Lau R, Aune D, et al. Red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: meta-analysis of prospective studies.
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20456. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020456.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research; 2007.
8.
Rizzo NS, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Sabaté J, Fraser GE. Nutrient profiles of vegetarian and nonvegetarian dietary patterns.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(12):1610-1619.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Fraser GE. Vegetarianism and obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and arthritis. In: Fraser GE, ed. Diet, Life Expectancy, and Chronic Disease: Studies of Seventh-Day Adventists and Other Vegetarians. New York, NY: Oxford Univ Press; 2003:129-148.
10.
Tonstad S, Butler T, Yan R, Fraser GE. Type of vegetarian diet, body weight, and prevalence of type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2009;32(5):791-796.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. Diet and body mass index in 38000 EPIC-Oxford meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(6):728-734.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Newby PK, Tucker KL, Wolk A. Risk of overweight and obesity among semivegetarian, lactovegetarian, and vegan women.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(6):1267-1274.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Ma Y, Yang Y, Wang F, et al. Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a systematic review of prospective studies.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53916. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053916.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Key TJ, Appleby PN, Spencer EA, Travis RC, Roddam AW, Allen NE. Cancer incidence in vegetarians: results from the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Oxford).
Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89(5):1620S-1626S.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Orlich MJ, Singh PN, Sabaté J, et al. Vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality in Adventist Health Study 2.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(13):1230-1238.
ArticlePubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Pettersen BJ, Anousheh R, Fan J, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Fraser GE. Vegetarian diets and blood pressure among white subjects: results from the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2).
Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(10):1909-1916.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Fraser GE, Katuli S, Anousheh R, Knutsen SF, Herring P, Fan J. Vegetarian diets and cardiovascular risk factors in black members of the Adventist Health Study-2.
Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(3):537-545.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Rizzo NS, Sabaté J, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Fraser GE. Vegetarian dietary patterns are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome: the Adventist Health Study 2.
Diabetes Care. 2011;34(5):1225-1227.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Tonstad S, Stewart K, Oda K, Batech M, Herring RP, Fraser GE. Vegetarian diets and incidence of diabetes in the Adventist Health Study-2.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;23(4):292-299.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Tantamango-Bartley Y, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Fan J, Fraser G. Vegetarian diets and the incidence of cancer in a low-risk population.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(2):286-294.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Singh PN, Fraser GE. Dietary risk factors for colon cancer in a low-risk population.
Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(8):761-774.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Butler TL, Fraser GE, Beeson WL, et al. Cohort profile: the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2).
Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(2):260-265.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Jaceldo-Siegl K, Knutsen SF, Sabaté J, et al. Validation of nutrient intake using an FFQ and repeated 24 h recalls in black and white subjects of the Adventist Health Study-2 (AHS-2).
Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(6):812-819.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Jaceldo-Siegl K, Fan J, Sabaté J, et al. Race-specific validation of food intake obtained from a comprehensive FFQ: the Adventist Health Study-2.
Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(11):1988-1997.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al, eds.
SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/. Accessed July 9, 2014.
26.
Fraser G, Yan R. Guided multiple imputation of missing data: using a subsample to strengthen the missing-at-random assumption.
Epidemiology. 2007;18(2):246-252.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Fraser GE, Yan R, Butler TL, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Beeson WL, Chan J. Missing data in a long food frequency questionnaire: are imputed zeroes correct?
Epidemiology. 2009;20(2):289-294.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Team R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing.
http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed July 15, 2011.
30.
Orlich MJ, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Sabaté J, Fan J, Singh PN, Fraser GE. Patterns of food consumption among vegetarians and non-vegetarians.
Br J Nutr. 2014;112(10):1644-1653.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
McKeown-Eyssen G. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer revisited: are serum triglycerides and/or plasma glucose associated with risk?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994;3(8):687-695.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
32.
Giovannucci E. Diet, body weight, and colorectal cancer: a summary of the epidemiologic evidence.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2003;12(2):173-182.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Tran TT, Naigamwalla D, Oprescu AI, et al. Hyperinsulinemia, but not other factors associated with insulin resistance, acutely enhances colorectal epithelial proliferation in vivo.
Endocrinology. 2006;147(4):1830-1837.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Choi Y, Giovannucci E, Lee JE. Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of diabetes-related cancers: a meta-analysis.
Br J Nutr. 2012;108(11):1934-1947.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Wei EK, Ma J, Pollak MN, et al. A prospective study of C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, and the risk of colorectal cancer in women.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(4):850-855.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Michaud DS, Fuchs CS, Liu S, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Giovannucci E. Dietary glycemic load, carbohydrate, sugar, and colorectal cancer risk in men and women.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(1):138-147.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
37.
Tsai C-J, Giovannucci EL. Hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, vitamin D, and colorectal cancer among whites and African Americans.
Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(10):2497-2503.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Bao Y, Nimptsch K, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Dietary insulin load, dietary insulin index, and colorectal cancer.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(12):3020-3026.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Giovannucci E, Pollak M, Liu Y, et al. Nutritional predictors of insulin-like growth factor I and their relationships to cancer in men.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(2):84-89.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
40.
Levine ME, Suarez JA, Brandhorst S, et al. Low protein intake is associated with a major reduction in IGF-1, cancer, and overall mortality in the 65 and younger but not older population.
Cell Metab. 2014;19(3):407-417.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Wu S, Feng B, Li K, et al. Fish consumption and colorectal cancer risk in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Am J Med. 2012;125(6):551-559.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Gerber M. Omega-3 fatty acids and cancers: a systematic update review of epidemiological studies.
Br J Nutr. 2012;107(S2)(suppl 2):S228-S239.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Bamia C, Lagiou P, Buckland G, et al. Mediterranean diet and colorectal cancer risk: results from a European cohort.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2013;28(4):317-328.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Schwingshackl L, Hoffmann G. Adherence to Mediterranean diet and risk of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Int J Cancer. 2014;135(8):1884-1897.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Key TJ, Appleby PN, Spencer EA, et al. Cancer incidence in British vegetarians.
Br J Cancer. 2009;101(1):192-197.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Agudo A, Slimani N, Ocké MC, et al. Consumption of vegetables, fruit and other plant foods in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohorts from 10 European countries.
Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(6B):1179-1196.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
47.
Davey GK, Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Allen NE, Knox KH, Key TJ. EPIC-Oxford: lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33 883 meat-eaters and 31 546 non meat-eaters in the UK.
Public Health Nutr. 2003;6(3):259-269.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Aune D, Chan DS, Lau R, et al. Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.
BMJ. 2011;343:d6617. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6617.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Spencer EA, Key TJ, Appleby PN, et al. Meat, poultry and fish and risk of colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of data from the UK Dietary Cohort Consortium.
Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(9):1417-1425.
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
darmkanker, rectumkanker, preventie, vegetarisch dieet, pecto vegetarier, vis, groenten, fruit, vlees
Gerelateerde artikelen
- Darmkanker wordt vaker ontdekt in vroeg stadium, minder operaties zijn nodig en overall is er een betere overleving. Blijkt uit IKNL rapport over bevolkingsonderzoek darmkanker
- AI - Kunstmatige Intelligentie spoort 40 procent meer darmpoliepen op dan gespecialiseerde artsen. Blijkt uit internationaal onderzoek van de Radboud universiteit
- Leefstijl, zoals rookstatus, alcoholgebruik, body mass index (BMI) en fysieke activiteit hebben grote invloed op wel of geen darmkanker krijgen.
- Vegetarisch dieet en dan vooral een vegetarisch dieet met wel vis vermindert sterk het risico op darmkanker en rectumkanker in vergelijking met een niet vegetarisch dieet
- Gemuteerde stamcellen in de darmen gebruiken slim mechanisme en zijn vaak oorzaak van darmkanker ontdekten onderzoekers aan het UMC Amsterdam
- Escherichia coli bacterie, een gewone veel voorkomende bacterie, zou darmkanker kunnen veroorzaken, aldus prof. dr. Hans Clevers na studie bij zelf gekweekte darmen en vergelijking met darmtumoren van darmkankerpatienten
- Berberine blijkt veilig en effectief te zijn bij het verminderen van het risico op recidief na operatie van darmpoliepen (47 vs 36 procent). Aldus placebo gecontroleerde fase III studie
- Omgevingsfactoren, genetische varianten en familiegeschiedenis samen blijken de beste resultaten te geven bij het voorspellen van het krijgen van darmkanker.
- Jaarlijkse ontlastingstest (FIT) als controle na verwijdering van poliepen is stukken goedkoper dan coloscopie maar mist 30 tot 70 procent een ontstaan van recidief van darmkanker
- Fecale Immunochemische Test - FIT - blijkt 90 procent nauwkeurig in voorspellen van wel of geen darmkanker. copy 1
- 29 procent stijging van darmkanker bij mannen in Engeland over de laatste 35 jaar. Bij vrouwen is slechts een stijging van 6 procent te zien.
- Darmkanker: Een periodieke colonoscopie - inwendig darmonderzoek - vermindert het risico op darmkanker stadium IIB of hoger met 70%. copy 1
- Alcohol gebruik geeft behoorlijk groot risico op darmkanker blijkt uit grote meta analyse.
- aspirine ter voorkoming van kanker of een recidief van kanker: een overzicht van studies met aspirine
- Fruit en groenten vermindert risico op darmkanker significant voor niet rokers. Bij rokers heeft fruit en groenten eten geen aantoonbaar effect . Aldus grote Europese Prospectieve studie.
- Multivitamines genomen over langere tijd - tien jaar of meer - geeft 30 procent minder risico op darmkanker, aldus epidemologische studie.
- Roken, rood vlees en alcohol zijn grote veroorzakers van dikke darmkanker. Zeker als deze alle drie tegelijk worden gebruikt
- Rood vlees geeft significant groter risico op spijsverteringskanker en slokdarmkanker, aldus grote prospectieve studie onder meer dan 500.000 volwassenen in 10 Europese landen.
- Preventie - darmkanker: wat kunt u er zelf aan doen om vormen van spijsverteringskanker, darmkanker te voorkomen. Hier een aantal artikelen en studies over de risico factoren