Helpt u ons aan 500 donateurs om kanker-actueel online te houden?

27 juli 2018: Bron: BMC Cancer, 

  • Received: 19 August 2017
  • Accepted: 22 June 2018
  • Published:

Halaven is a synthetic analogue of halichondrin b, isolated from the marine sponge Halichondria Okadai. Photo: courtesy of Eisai.

Studieresultaten:

43,8% van de 32 patiënten die op moment van de tussenevaluatie konder worden beoordeeld reageerden goed op dit medicijn, met een klinisch voordeel van 56,3% en een tumorcontrole van 78,1% (stabiele ziekte minimaal). De mediane ziekteprogressievrije overleving was 8,3 maanden. Vaak gemelde bijwerkingen waren neutropenie, haaruitval en perifere neuropathie. Uit de groep van 32 bereikten er drie een CR = complete remissie. Dat is opmerkelijk omdat er zelden uit deze groep van patiënten een complete remissie bereiken met chemo. Hier is dat dus 10 procent.

Hier respectievelijk de karakteristieken van de deelnemende vrouwen en daaronder een grafiek met de resultaten per patiënt:

Table 3

Objective response rates for over all population and subgroups of patients

 

N

Overall response rate (%)

Clinical benefit rate (%)

Median PFS (95%CI), months

Overall

32

43.8

56.3

8.3 (7.1–9.4)

Hormone receptor status

 HR(−)

12

33.3

41.7

5.5 (0–11.5)

 HR(+)

20

50

65

8.8 (6.46–11.0)

No. of prior chemotherapy

 0

22

50

54.5

8.8 (7.4–10.1)

 1

10

30

70

8.3 (3.7–12.8)

Metastatic site

 Visceral

23

43.5

60.9

8.3 (7.2–9.3)

 Non-visceral

9

44.4

44.4

9.0 (4.2–13.8)

Dose reduction during treatment

 No reduction

18

33.3

50

8.8 (3.9–13.6)

 Reduction

14

57.1

64.3

8.3 (7.8–8.7)

Hormone receptor status

 Triple negative

11

36.4

36.4

5.5 (1.3–9.7)

 Other

21

47.6

71.4

8.8 (7.0–10.5)

Hier een grafiek van de resultaten uit de studie:

Table 2

Efficacy outcomes

 

No. of patients

%

95%CI

All assessable patients

32

   

 CR

3

9.4

 

 PR

11

34.4

 

 SD

11

34.4

 

 PD

4

12.5

 

 NE

3

9.4

 

Overall response (CR + PR)

14

43.8

(26.5–61.0)

Clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD6 months)

18

56.3

(39.0–73.5)

Tumor control rate (CR + PR + SD)

25

78.1

(63.8–92.5)

Figure 1
Fig. 1

Waterfall graphs of percentage change in the total sum of target lesion diameters from baseline to postbaseline nadir (RECIST v1.1)

Phase II trial of eribulin mesylate as a first- or second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, single-arm trial

This trial was retrospectively registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trial Registry (ID number: UMIN000010334).

Eribulin may be another option for first-line chemotherapeutic regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

Phase II trial of eribulin mesylate as a first- or second-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, single-arm trial

  • Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • ,
  • and
BMC Cancer201818:701

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4628-7

  • Received: 19 August 2017
  • Accepted: 22 June 2018
  • Published:

Background

Eribulin mesylate is currently indicated as a sequential monotherapy to be administered after two chemotherapeutic regimens, including anthracycline and taxane treatments, for treatment of metastatic breast cancer. This open-label, multicenter phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin as a first- or second-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

The primary objective was to determine the overall response rate. Secondary objectives were to evaluate progression-free survival and the safety profile. Patients were scheduled to receive eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Patients received the study treatment unless disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a request to discontinue from the patient and/or investigator eventuated.

Results

Between December 2012 and September 2015, 32 patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled at 10 participating clinical institutions in Japan, and toxicity and response rates were evaluated. The overall response rate was 43.8% (95% confidence interval 26.5–61.0). The clinical benefit and tumor control rates were 56.3% (95% CI 39.0–73.5) and 78.1% (95% CI 63.8–92.5), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 8.3 months (95% CI 7.1–9.4). A subgroup analysis did not identify any factors affecting the efficacy of eribulin. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (71.9%), alopecia (68.7%), and peripheral neuropathy (46.9%). As a first- or second-line therapy, eribulin showed sufficient efficacy for metastatic breast cancer compared with taxane and capecitabine treatment in previous clinical trials. The safety profile of eribulin was acceptable.

Conclusions

Eribulin may be another option for first-line chemotherapeutic regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

Trial registrations

This trial was retrospectively registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trial Registry (ID number: UMIN000010334).

Date of trial registration: April 1st, 2013.

References:

  1. Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2206–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Colozza M, de Azambuja E, Personeni N, Lebrun F, Piccart MJ, Cardoso F. Achievements in systemic therapies in the pregenomic era in metastatic breast cancer. Oncologist. 2007;12(3):253–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jordan MA, Kamath K, Manna T, Okouneva T, Miller HP, Davis C, Littlefield BA, Wilson L. The primary antimitotic mechanism of action of the synthetic halichondrin E7389 is suppression of microtubule growth. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4(7):1086–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cortes J, O'Shaughnessy J, Loesch D, Blum JL, Vahdat LT, Petrakova K, Chollet P, Manikas A, Dieras V, Delozier T, et al. Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet. 2011;377(9769):914–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaufman PA, Awada A, Twelves C, Yelle L, Perez EA, Velikova G, Olivo MS, He Y, Dutcus CE, Cortes J. Phase III open-label randomized study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(6):594–601.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Twelves C, Cortes J, Vahdat L, Olivo M, He Y, Kaufman PA, Awada A. Efficacy of eribulin in women with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;148(3):553–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Partridge AH, Rumble RB, Carey LA, Come SE, Davidson NE, Di Leo A, Gralow J, Hortobagyi GN, Moy B, Yee D et al: Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 2014, 32(29):3307–3329.Google Scholar
  8. Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J, Dickler M, Cobleigh M, Perez EA, Shenkier T, Cella D, Davidson NE. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(26):2666–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Stockler MR, Harvey VJ, Francis PA, Byrne MJ, Ackland SP, Fitzharris B, Van Hazel G, Wilcken NR, Grimison PS, Nowak AK, et al. Capecitabine versus classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(34):4498–504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Yoshida T, Ozawa Y, Kimura T, Sato Y, Kuznetsov G, Xu S, Uesugi M, Agoulnik S, Taylor N, Funahashi Y, et al. Eribulin mesilate suppresses experimental metastasis of breast cancer cells by reversing phenotype from epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) to mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) states. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(6):1497–505.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Agoulnik SI, Kawano S, Taylor N, Oestreicher J, Matsui J, Chow J, Oda Y, Funahashi Y. Eribulin mesylate exerts specific gene expression changes in pericytes and shortens pericyte-driven capillary network in vitro. Vasc Cell. 2014;6(1):3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Ueda S, Saeki T, Takeuchi H, Shigekawa T, Yamane T, Kuji I, Osaki A. In vivo imaging of eribulin-induced reoxygenation in advanced breast cancer patients: a comparison to bevacizumab. Br J Cancer. 2016;114(11):1212–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. McIntyre K, O'Shaughnessy J, Schwartzberg L, Gluck S, Berrak E, Song JX, Cox D, Vahdat LT. Phase 2 study of eribulin mesylate as first-line therapy for locally recurrent or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;146(2):321–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Takashima T, Tokunaga S, Tei S, Nishimura S, Kawajiri H, Kashiwagi S, Yamagata S, Noda S, Nishimori T, Mizuyama Y, et al. A phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial of eribulin as first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Springerplus. 2016;5:164.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright


Plaats een reactie ...

Reageer op "Eribuline mesylaat is net zo effectief of beter dan chemo als eerste- of tweedelijnsbehandeling voor lokaal gevorderde of uitgezaaide borstkanker"


Gerelateerde artikelen
 

Gerelateerde artikelen

Studiepublicaties van niet-toxische >> ESMO 2023: aanbevolen abstracten >> ASCO 2024: aanbevolen abstracten >> 177Lu-FAP-2286 geeft uitstekende >> Algemeen: Borstkanker korte >> Arimidex - anastrozole informatie >> Arimidex: 2 jaar aromataseremmers >> Artemisinin - Armesia: informatie >> Avastin in combinatie met >> Bestraling bij borstkanker: >>